Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000673›Full record

ReviewBMB reports2022

Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle therapy for acute brain insults and neurodegenerative diseases.

Oh Young Bang, Ji-Eun Kim

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMB reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cell-cell communication: new insights and clinical implications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Extracellular vesicles as tools and targets in therapy for diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Engineered EVs designed to target diseases of the CNS.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Review
  19. The Evolving Landscape of Potency Assays.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oh Young BangDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351; S&E bio, Inc, Seoul 06351; Translational and Stem Cell Research Laboratory on Stroke, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351; Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Ji-Eun KimTranslational and Stem Cell Research Laboratory on Stroke, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351; Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Samsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell-based therapy is a promising approach for treating a variety of disorders, including acute brain insults and neurodegenerative diseases. Stem cells such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) secrete extracellular vesicles (EVs), circular membrane fragments (30 nm-1 μm) that are shed from the cell surface, carrying several therapeutic molecules such as proteins and microRNAs. Because EV-based therapy is superior to cell therapy in terms of scalable production, biodistribution, and safety profiles, it can be used to treat brain diseases as an alternative to stem cell therapy. This review presents evidences evaluating the role of stem cell-derived EVs in stroke, traumatic brain injury, and degenerative brain diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson' disease. In addition, stem cell-derived EVs have better profiles in biocompatibility, immunogenicity, and safety than those of small chemical and macromolecules. The advantages and disadvantages of EVs compared with other strategies are discussed. Even though EVs obtained from native stem cells have potential in the treatment of brain diseases, the successful clinical application is limited by the short half-life, limited targeting, rapid clearance after application, and insufficient payload. We discuss the strategies to enhance the efficacy of EV therapeutics. Finally, EV therapies have yet to be approved by the regulatory authorities. Major issues are discussed together with relevant advances in the clinical application of EV therapeutics. [BMB Reports 2022; 55(1): 20-29].

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesMesenchymal Stem CellsNeurodegenerative DiseasesBrainHumansTissue Distribution

Identifiers

PMID35000673
PMCPMC8810548
OpenAlexW4206864925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.