Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000668›Full record

ArticleDisaster medicine and public health preparedness2022

Psychological Effects of COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers, and How They Are Coping: A Web-Based, Cross-Sectional Study During the First Wave of COVID-19 in Pakistan.

Muhammad Salman, Zia Ul Mustafa, Muhammad Husnnain Raza, Tahir Mehmood Khan, Noman Asif, Humera Tahir, Naureen Shehzadi, Tauqeer Hussain Mallhi, Yusra Habib Khan, Kishwar Sultana and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: A Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad SalmanFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4366-1461
Zia Ul MustafaDepartment of Pharmacy Services, District Headquarter Hospital, Pakpattan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Husnnain RazaFaisalabad Institute of Cardiology, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Tahir Mehmood KhanInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Noman AsifPunjab University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Humera TahirRuth Pfau College of Nutrition Sciences, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Naureen ShehzadiPunjab University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Tauqeer Hussain MallhiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka, Al-Jouf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Yusra Habib KhanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka, Al-Jouf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Kishwar SultanaFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Fahad SaleemFaculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan.
Khalid HussainPunjab University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
University of the Punjab · PKJouf University · SAUniversity of Lahore · PKCMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry · PKMonash University Malaysia · MYPakistan Army · PKUniversity of Balochistan · PKUniversity of Faisalabad · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to ascertain the psychological impacts of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) among the Pakistani health care workers (HCWs) and their coping strategies.

methodsThis web-based, cross-sectional study was conducted among HCWs (N = 398) from Punjab Province of Pakistan. The generalized anxiety scale (GAD-7), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Brief-COPE were used to assess anxiety, depression, and coping strategies, respectively.

resultsThe average age of respondents was 28.67 years (SD = 4.15), with the majority being medical doctors (52%). Prevalences of anxiety and depression were 21.4% and 21.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in anxiety and depression scores among doctors, nurses, and pharmacists. Females had significantly higher anxiety (

conclusionA considerable proportion of HCWs are having generalized anxiety and depression during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings call for interventions to mitigate mental health risks in HCWs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInternetMalePakistanPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesanxietycopingCOVID-19depressionhealth care workersPakistan

Identifiers

PMID35000668
PMCPMC8963974
OpenAlexW4205702226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.