Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000619›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2022

Gut microbiota and age shape susceptibility to clostridial enteritis in lorikeets under human care.

David Minich, Christopher Madden, Mauricio A Navarro, Leo Glowacki, Kristen French-Kim, Willow Chan, Morgan V Evans, Kilmer Soares, Ryan Mrofchak, Rushil Madan and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

David Minich *Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Christopher Madden *Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Mauricio A NavarroCalifornia Animal Health & Food Safety Lab, University of California, Davis, San Bernardino, CA, USA.
Leo GlowackiOhio State University College of Arts and Sciences, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kristen French-KimDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Willow ChanOhio State University College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, Columbus, OH, USA.
Morgan V EvansDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Kilmer SoaresDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Ryan MrofchakDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Rushil MadanDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Gregory A BallashDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Krista LaPerleDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Subhadeep PaulOhio State University College of Arts and Sciences, Columbus, OH, USA.
Yael VodovotzOhio State University College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, Columbus, OH, USA.
Francisco A UzalCalifornia Animal Health & Food Safety Lab, University of California, Davis, San Bernardino, CA, USA.
Margaret MartinezDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Jennifer HausmannDenver Zoo, Denver, CO, USA.
Randall E JungeColumbus Zoo and Aquarium, Columbus, OH, USA.
Vanessa L HaleDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, 1902 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. hale.502@osu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8531-7001
The Ohio State University · USFlorida State University · USAustral University of Chile · CLCalifornia State University, San Bernardino · USColumbus Zoo and Aquarium · USDenver Zoo · USMarine Mammal Center · USUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BR

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Short Trem Research Training for Veterinary StudentsT35OD010977 · OD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Christine A Petersen · 2012 to 2026
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NIH HHS T35 OD010977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteritis is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in lorikeets that can be challenging to diagnose and treat. In this study, we examine gut microbiota in two lorikeet flocks with enteritis (Columbus Zoo and Aquarium-CZA; Denver Zoo-DZ). Since 2012, the CZA flock has experienced repeated outbreaks of enteritis despite extensive diet, husbandry, and clinical modifications. In 2018, both CZA and DZ observed a spike in enteritis. Recent research has revealed that the gut microbiota can influence susceptibility to enteropathogens. We hypothesized that a dysbiosis, or alteration in the gut microbial community, was making some lorikeets more susceptible to enteritis, and our goal was to characterize this dysbiosis and determine the features that predicted susceptibility.

resultsWe employed 16S rRNA sequencing to characterize the cloacal microbiota in lorikeets (CZA n = 67, DZ n = 24) over time. We compared the microbiota of healthy lorikeets, to lorikeets with enteritis, and lorikeets susceptible to enteritis, with "susceptible" being defined as healthy birds that subsequently developed enteritis. Based on sequencing data, culture, and toxin gene detection in intestinal contents, we identified Clostridium perfringens type A (CZA and DZ) and C. colinum (CZA only) at increased relative abundances in birds with enteritis. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry further identified the presence of gram-positive bacilli and C. perfringens, respectively, in the necrotizing intestinal lesions. Finally, using Random Forests and LASSO models, we identified several features (young age and the presence of Rhodococcus fascians and Pseudomonas umsongensis) associated with susceptibility to clostridial enteritis.

conclusionsWe identified C. perfringens type A and C. colinum associated with lorikeet necrohemorrhagic enteritis at CZA and DZ. Susceptibility testing of isolates lead to an updated clinical treatment plan which ultimately resolved the outbreaks at both institutions. This work provides a foundation for understanding gut microbiota features that are permissive to clostridial colonization and host factors (e.g. age, prior infection) that shape responses to infection.

Indexed as

ClostridiumEnteritisGut microbiotaLorikeetsTrypsin

Identifiers

PMID35000619
PMCPMC8744333
OpenAlexW4226047713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.