ReviewBiomarker research2022
The changing landscape of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): fundamentals and controversies.
Review in Biomarker research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A Phase I Trial of Iopofosine I 131 and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Cancers · 2026Article
- Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and 1-3 Prior Lines of Therapy: Optum Database.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Individualized dynamic risk assessment and treatment selection for multiple myeloma.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Multiple Myeloma: Improved Outcomes Resulting from a Rapidly Expanding Number of Therapeutic Options.Targeted oncology · 2025Review
- MicroRNA-665 and its potential role in drug response and survival outcomes in multiple myeloma: a preliminary study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Regulatory role of E3 ubiquitin ligases in multiple myeloma: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Perspectives of Healthcare Providers and Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma on Treatment Priorities and Novel Therapies.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Lys-63-specific deubiquitinase BRCC36 enhances the sensitivity of multiple myeloma cells to lenalidomide by inhibiting lysosomal degradation of cereblon.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- An overview of multiple myeloma: A monoclonal plasma cell malignancy's diagnosis, management, and treatment modalities.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2024Review
- CAR-T Therapy in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Health care resource utilization and costs among patients with multiple myeloma with exposure to double-class or triple-class multiple myeloma treatments: A retrospective US claims database analysis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Article
- Real-World Outcomes of Belantamab Mafodotin for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Preliminary Results of a Spanish Expanded Access Program (EAP).Oncology and therapy · 2023Article
- A digital twin model for evidence-based clinical decision support in multiple myeloma treatment.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, and Spain: results from a discrete choice experiment.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- The Urgent Need for Precision Medicine in Cancer and Its Microenvironment: The Paradigmatic Case of Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A novel E-cadherin/SOX9 axis regulates cancer stem cells in multiple myeloma by activating Akt and MAPK pathways.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022Article
- What's Old is New: The Past, Present and Future Role of Thalidomide in the Modern-Day Management of Multiple Myeloma.Targeted oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increase in the number of therapeutic alternatives for both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients has widened the clinical scenario, leading to a level of complexity that no algorithm has been able to cover up to date. At present, this complexity increases due to the wide variety of clinical situations found in MM patients before they reach the status of relapsed/refractory disease. These different backgrounds may include primary refractoriness, early relapse after completion of first-line therapy with latest-generation agents, or very late relapse after chemotherapy or autologous transplantation. It is also important to bear in mind that many patient profiles are not fully represented in the main randomized clinical trials (RCT), and this further complicates treatment decision-making. In RRMM patients, the choice of previously unused drugs and the number and duration of previous therapeutic regimens until progression has a greater impact on treatment efficacy than the adverse biological characteristics of MM itself. In addition to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 antibodies and corticosteroids, a new generation of drugs such as XPO inhibitors, BCL-2 inhibitors, new alkylators and, above all, immunotherapy based on conjugated anti-BCMA antibodies and CAR-T cells, have been developed to fight RRMM. This comprehensive review addresses the fundamentals and controversies regarding RRMM, and discusses the main aspects of management and treatment. The basis for the clinical management of RRMM (complexity of clinical scenarios, key factors to consider before choosing an appropriate treatment, or when to treat), the arsenal of new drugs with no cross resistance with previously administered standard first line regimens (main phase 3 clinical trials), the future outlook including the usefulness of abandoned resources, together with the controversies surrounding the clinical management of RRMM patients will be reviewed in detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.