Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000603›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2022

Hyperoxemia in postsurgical sepsis/septic shock patients is associated with reduced mortality.

Marta Martín-Fernández, María Heredia-Rodríguez, Irene González-Jiménez, Mario Lorenzo-López, Estefanía Gómez-Pesquera, Rodrigo Poves-Álvarez, F Javier Álvarez, Pablo Jorge-Monjas, Juan Beltrán-DeHeredia, Eduardo Gutiérrez-Abejón and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Hyperoxia in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Marta Martín-Fernández *Department of Medicine, Toxicology and Dermatology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. mmartin.iecscyl@saludcastillayleon.es.
María Heredia-Rodríguez *BioCritic, Group for Biomedical Research in Critical Care Medicine, Valladolid, Spain.
Irene González-JiménezBioCritic, Group for Biomedical Research in Critical Care Medicine, Valladolid, Spain.
Mario Lorenzo-LópezBioCritic, Group for Biomedical Research in Critical Care Medicine, Valladolid, Spain.
Estefanía Gómez-PesqueraBioCritic, Group for Biomedical Research in Critical Care Medicine, Valladolid, Spain.
Rodrigo Poves-ÁlvarezBioCritic, Group for Biomedical Research in Critical Care Medicine, Valladolid, Spain.
F Javier ÁlvarezBioCritic, Group for Biomedical Research in Critical Care Medicine, Valladolid, Spain.
Pablo Jorge-MonjasBioCritic, Group for Biomedical Research in Critical Care Medicine, Valladolid, Spain.
Juan Beltrán-DeHerediaDepartment of Surgery, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Eduardo Gutiérrez-AbejónCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Herrera-GómezCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Gabriella GuzzoTransplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Esther Gómez-SánchezBioCritic, Group for Biomedical Research in Critical Care Medicine, Valladolid, Spain.
Álvaro Tamayo-VelascoCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Rocío AllerDepartment of Medicine, Toxicology and Dermatology, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Paolo Pelosi *Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Jesús Villar *CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. jesus.villar54@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5687-3562
Eduardo Tamayo *BioCritic, Group for Biomedical Research in Critical Care Medicine, Valladolid, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversidad de Valladolid · ESOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Fundación Ramón Areces CIVP19A5953Instituto de Salud Carlos III CB06/06/1088Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/00049Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/01238Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI 19/00141Junta de Castilla y León (ES) GRS 1922/A/19Junta de Castilla y León (ES) GRS 2057/A/19Junta de Castilla y León (ES) VA321P18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite growing interest in treatment strategies that limit oxygen exposure in ICU patients, no studies have compared conservative oxygen with standard oxygen in postsurgical patients with sepsis/septic shock, although there are indications that it may improve outcomes. It has been proven that high partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO

methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study in 454 patients who underwent major surgery admitted into a single ICU. Patients were stratified in two groups whether they had hyperoxemia, defined as PaO

resultsIn patients with PaO

conclusionsOxygenation with a PaO

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticAdultHumansIntensive Care UnitsProcalcitoninPrognosisProspective StudiesProcalcitoninHyperoxemiaInfectionOutcomeSepsisSeptic ShockSurgical patients

Identifiers

PMID35000603
PMCPMC8744280
OpenAlexW4206131085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.