Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000443›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Costs dictate strategic investment in dominance interactions.

Tobit Dehnen, Danai Papageorgiou, Brendah Nyaguthii, Wismer Cherono, Julia Penndorf, Neeltje J Boogert, Damien R Farine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The relative contribution of acoustic signals versus movement cues in group coordination and collective decision-making.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Demographic turnover can be a leading driver of hierarchy dynamics, and social inheritance modifies its effects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Social hierarchies and social networks in humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Emergence of size-structured dominance hierarchies through size-dependent feedback.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Hot-headed peckers: thermographic changes during aggression among juvenile pheasants (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. DomArchive: a century of published dominance data.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. The dynamics of dominance: open questions, challenges and solutions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Dominance in a socially dynamic setting: hierarchical structure and conflict dynamics in ravens' foraging groups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Behavioural and physiological plasticity in social hierarchies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tobit DehnenCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.
Danai PapageorgiouDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Brendah NyaguthiiDepartment of Ornithology, National Museums of Kenya, PO Box 40658-001000, Nairobi, Kenya.
Wismer CheronoMpala Research Centre, PO Box 555-10400, Nanyuki 10400, Kenya.
Julia PenndorfCognitive and Cultural Ecology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Animal Behavior, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany.
Neeltje J BoogertCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.
Damien R FarineDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-7613

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009122/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dominance is important for access to resources. As dominance interactions are costly, individuals should be strategic in whom they interact with. One hypothesis is that individuals should direct costly interactions towards those closest in rank, as they have most to gain-in terms of attaining or maintaining dominance-from winning such interactions. Here, we show that male vulturine guineafowl (

Indexed as

AggressionSocial DominanceHumansMaleaggressiondominance hierarchyranksocial behavioursocial cognitionsocial structure

Identifiers

PMID35000443
PMCPMC8743880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.