ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022
Dominance in a socially dynamic setting: hierarchical structure and conflict dynamics in ravens' foraging groups.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluctuations in direct human presence, not predictable weekly cycles, influence avoidance behaviour in ravens.Movement ecology · 2026Article
- Spatio-temporal patterns of juvenile common ravens integrating into a free-flying non-breeder flock.iScience · 2026Article
- Fission-fusion dynamics and spring movements in first-year carrion crows Corvus corone challenge the efficiency of culling strategies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effects of a short-term removal of the dominant male on vocalization in captive groups of large-billed crows (Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Pinyon Jays (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) and Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) can discriminate between pilfering and non-pilfering conspecifics, but not between heterospecifics.Animal cognition · 2025Article
- Patterns of object play behaviour and its functional implications in free-flying common ravens.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Aggressiveness predicts dominance rank in greylag geese: mirror tests and agonistic interactions.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Why are ravens smart? Exploring the social intelligence hypothesis.Journal of ornithology · 2024Review
- A comparative study of mirror self-recognition in three corvid species.Animal cognition · 2023Article
- Social dynamics impact scolding behaviour in captive groups of common ravens (Corvus corax).Frontiers in zoology · 2022Article
- Social encounters produce different autonomic response between dominants and subordinates in crows.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- The spatial and temporal exploitation of anthropogenic food sources by common ravens (Corvus corax) in the Alps.Movement ecology · 2022Article
- DomArchive: a century of published dominance data.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dominance hierarchies typically emerge in systems where group members regularly encounter and compete for resources. In birds, the 'open' and dynamic structure of foraging groups may prevent the emergence of structured hierarchies, although this assumption have hardly been tested. We report on agonistic data for ravens
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.