Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000438›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Neural systems that facilitate the representation of social rank.

Madeleine F Dwortz, James P Curley, Kay M Tye, Nancy Padilla-Coreano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How dopamine guides our social world.Pharmacological reviews · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Social dominance in rats is a determinant of susceptibility to stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Little "Re-Cognition" Goes a Long Way for Pro-Cognitive Therapeutics in Alcohol Studies.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madeleine F DwortzDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
James P CurleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5546-007X
Kay M TyeSystems Neuroscience Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Nancy Padilla-CoreanoSystems Neuroscience Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9293-2697

Funding

Neural Circuit Mechanisms of Social Homeostasis in Individuals and Supraorganismal Social GroupsDP1AT009925 · NCCIH · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI TYE, KAY MAXINE · 2017 to 2021
$6.4M
Exploring neural circuit mechanisms of social contact and social isolationR01MH115920 · NIMH · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI TYE, KAY MAXINE · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Studying how the hippocampal-prefrontal-hypothalamic circuit encodes social dominanceR00MH124435 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PADILLA COREANO, NANCY · 2022 to 2024
$785k
NCCIH NIH HHS DP1 AT009925NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH124435NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across species, animals organize into social dominance hierarchies that serve to decrease aggression and facilitate survival of the group. Neuroscientists have adopted several model organisms to study dominance hierarchies in the laboratory setting, including fish, reptiles, rodents and primates. We review recent literature across species that sheds light onto how the brain represents social rank to guide socially appropriate behaviour within a dominance hierarchy. First, we discuss how the brain responds to social status signals. Then, we discuss social approach and avoidance learning mechanisms that we propose could drive rank-appropriate behaviour. Lastly, we discuss how the brain represents memories of individuals (social memory) and how this may support the maintenance of unique individual relationships within a social group. This article is part of the theme issue 'The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies'.

Indexed as

Hierarchy, SocialSocial DominanceAggressionAnimalsanimal modelsneural circuitssocial learningsocial rank

Identifiers

PMID35000438
PMCPMC8743891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.