Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000437›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies.

Eli D Strauss, James P Curley, Daizaburo Shizuka, Elizabeth A Hobson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Social dominance influences individual susceptibility to an evolutionary trap in mosquitofish.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural Circuit Transitions Supporting Developmentally Specific Social Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mechanisms of equality and inequality in mammalian societies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Demographic turnover can be a leading driver of hierarchy dynamics, and social inheritance modifies its effects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Toward an evolutionary ecology of (in)equality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Eli D StraussDepartment of Collective Behavior, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3413-1642
James P CurleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5546-007X
Daizaburo ShizukaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0478-6309
Elizabeth A HobsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1523-6967
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · USDepartment of Biological Sciences · RUInstitute of Psychology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A century ago, foundational work by Thorleif Schjelderup-Ebbe described a 'pecking order' in chicken societies, where individuals could be ordered according to their ability to exert their influence over their group-mates. Now known as dominance hierarchies, these structures have been shown to influence a plethora of individual characteristics and outcomes, situating dominance research as a pillar of the study of modern social ecology and evolution. Here, we first review some of the major questions that have been answered about dominance hierarchies in the last 100 years. Next, we introduce the contributions to this theme issue and summarize how they provide ongoing insight in the epistemology, physiology and neurobiology, hierarchical structure, and dynamics of dominance. These contributions employ the full range of research approaches available to modern biologists. Cross-cutting themes emerging from these contributions include a focus on cognitive underpinnings of dominance, the application of network-analytical approaches, and the utility of experimental rank manipulations for revealing causal relationships. Reflection on the last 100 years of dominance research reveals how Schjelderup-Ebbe's early ideas and the subsequent research helped drive a shift from an essentialist view of species characteristics to the modern recognition of rich inter-individual variation in social, behavioural and physiological phenotypes. This article is part of the theme issue 'The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies'.

Indexed as

AggressionSocial DominanceRecognition, PsychologySocial BehaviorSocial Environmentaggressionimmunologyranksocial cognitionsocial evolutionsocial status

Identifiers

PMID35000437
PMCPMC8743894
OpenAlexW4206731553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.