Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000418›Full record

Observational studyCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Risk Factors for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer.

Anna Lewandowska, Grzegorz Rudzki, Tomasz Lewandowski, Aleksandra Stryjkowska-Góra, Sławomir Rudzki

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. BioMed research international · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Association between smoking and colorectal cancer in Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna LewandowskaInstitute of Healthcare, State School of Technology and Economics in Jaroslaw, Jaroslaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7743-5035
Grzegorz RudzkiChair and Department of Endocrinology, 49554Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-9419
Tomasz LewandowskiInstitute of Technical Engineering, State School of Technology and Economics in Jaroslaw, Jaroslaw, Poland.
Aleksandra Stryjkowska-GóraDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Translational Medicine, 49726University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland.
Sławomir RudzkiI Chair and Department of General and Transplant Surgery and Nutritional, 49554Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PLState University of Applied Sciences in Jaroslaw · PLUniversity of Rzeszów · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer defined as cancer of the colon or rectum, is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer in men and the second in women, and, according to the World Health Organization database GLOBOCAN, it accounts for nearly 1.4 million new cases annually worldwide. The occurrence of colorectal cancer is associated with nonmodifiable risk factors, including age and hereditary factors, as well as with modifiable environmental and lifestyle factors.

methodsThe study included 800 patients, 400 diagnosed with colorectal cancer and 400 within the control group, who gave their written informed consent to participate in the study. Patients with cancer other than colorectal cancer were randomly selected for control group I, and patients with no cancer diagnosis were selected for control group II. The method used was a case-control study - an observational and analytical study with a control group, conducted among patients of the Clinical Oncology Centre and the Provincial Hospital in the years 2019-2020. The study comparing the exposure was carried out in a group of people who developed the endpoint, that is colorectal cancer, with the exposure in a well-matched group of controls who did not reach the endpoint. Assessment of activity and BMI was used according to WHO recommendations, as well as the expert system. The data were tested for the distribution and the homogeneity of variance was validated before applying the parameter tests. Comparison of quantitative variables between groups was performed using ANOVA.

resultsThe mean age of the patients was 64.53 ± 8.86 years, of the control group I - 59.64 ± 9.33 and the control group II - 57.5 (7.83). There was a strong positive association between the incidence of ulcerative colitis and the risk of colorectal cancer (

conclusionsObesity, low physical activity, active and passive smoking and high salt and red meat consumption have been associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. These findings provide further evidence of the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle.

Indexed as

AgedCase-Control StudiesColitis, UlcerativeColorectal NeoplasmsDietEarly Detection of CancerExerciseFemaleHumansIncidenceLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedObesityRisk FactorsSmokingcancer riskcolorectal cancerenvironmental factorsgenetic factorsrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35000418
PMCPMC8753079
OpenAlexW4206036408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.