Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000264›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2022

Assessment of tumor burden and response to therapy in patients with colorectal cancer using a quantitative ctDNA test for methylated BCAT1/IKZF1.

Erin L Symonds, Susanne K Pedersen, Bernita Yeo, Hiba Al Naji, Susan E Byrne, Amitesh Roy, Graeme P Young

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Value and research advances of ctDNA in perioperative therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessment of methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic biomarker in esophagogastric adenocarcinomas.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A review on trends in development and translation of omics signatures in cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Erin L SymondsBowel Health Service, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2451-0358
Susanne K PedersenCancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Bernita YeoDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Hiba Al NajiDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Susan E ByrneCancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Amitesh RoyCancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Graeme P YoungCancer Research, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Flinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Failure of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment is due to residual disease, and its timely identification is critical for patient survival. Detecting CRC-associated mutations in patient circulating cell-free DNA is confounded by tumor mutation heterogeneity, requiring primary tumor sequencing to identify relevant mutations. In this study, we assessed BCAT1 and IKZF1 methylation levels to quantify circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and investigated whether this method can be used to assess tumor burden and efficacy of therapy. In 175 patients with CRC who were ctDNA-positive pretreatment, ctDNA levels were higher with advancing stage (P < 0.05) and correlated with tumor diameter (r = 0.35, P < 0.001) and volume (r = 0.58, P < 0.01). After completion of treatment (median of 70 days [IQR 49-109] after surgery, +/- radiotherapy, +/- chemotherapy), ctDNA levels were reduced in 98% (47/48) and were undetectable in 88% (42/48) of patients tested. For those with incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, roughly half remained ctDNA-positive (11/21, 52.4%). The presence of ctDNA after treatment was associated with disease progression (HR 9.7, 95%CI 2.5-37.6) compared to no ctDNA. Assaying blood for ctDNA methylated in BCAT1/IKZF1 has the potential for identifying residual disease due to treatment failure, informing a potential need for therapy adjustment in advanced disease.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationHumansIkaros Transcription FactorTransaminasesTumor BurdenBCAT1 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAIkaros Transcription FactorIKZF1 protein, humanTransaminasesBCAT1circulating tumor DNAcolorectal cancerefficacyIKZF1methylation

Identifiers

PMID35000264
PMCPMC9120880
OpenAlexW4206206638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.