Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000237›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2022

Group depositions to the Protein Data Bank need adequate presentation and different archiving protocol.

Mariusz Jaskolski, Alexander Wlodawer, Zbigniew Dauter, Wladek Minor, Bernhard Rupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Halogen bonds between ligands and proteins: Can we use them in validation?Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Duplicate entries in the Protein Data Bank: how to detect and handle them.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CMM-An enhanced platform for interactive validation of metal binding sites.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariusz JaskolskiFaculty of Chemistry, A. Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1587-6489
Alexander WlodawerCenter for Structural Biology, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5510-9703
Zbigniew DauterCenter for Structural Biology, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8806-9066
Wladek MinorDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-7090
Bernhard Ruppk.-k Hofkristallamt, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3300-6965

Funding

Protein StructureZIABC010348 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WLODAWER, ALEXANDER · 2009 to 2025
$27.5M
Reproducible, Unbiased Ligand Identification Assisted by Artificial Intelligence and Development of Ligand Reference LibrariesR01GM132595 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MINOR, WLADEK · 2019 to 2022
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProtein Conformation

Identifiers

PMID35000237
PMCPMC8927872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.