ArticleRheumatology and therapy2022
Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome with and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction/Angina: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Recombinant Human Brain Natriuretic Peptides on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Antiphospholipid antibodies and atherosclerotic vascular disease: recent advances.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute myocardial infarct/angina (AMI-A) is a possible complication in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (pAPS) patients. This study compares data obtained from pAPS patients with and without AMI-A.
methodsThis cross-sectional study of 66 (85.2% female) pAPS patients (Sidney criteria). Demographics, clinical data, medication use, and antiphospholipid antibodies were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: pAPS with AMI-A and pAPS without AMI-A.
resultsSixty-six patients with primary APS (six with AMI-A and 60 without AMI-A) were selected. They were similar for demographics, disease duration, and anthropometrics (p > 0.05). Patients with AMI-A compared to those patients without AMI-A had more frequently dyslipidemia (66 vs. 28%, p = 0.05), systemic hypertension (83 vs. 37%, p = 0.02), and increased levels of lipoprotein (a) (116 ± 67 vs. 36 ± 35 mg/dl, p = 0.0002). Interesting, current physical activity (66.7 vs. 23%, p = 0.04) was more seen in the first group when compared to the second one. Patients with AMI-A used more statins (66 vs. 22%, p = 0.017) and acetylsalicylic (100 vs. 28%, p = 0.05). Higher median levels of IgM anticardiolipin antibodies [70 (0-120) vs. 9 (0-120), p = 0.03] were observed in the first group.
conclusionspAPS patients and AMI-A have distinct clinical and laboratory spectra from those without AMI-A. It is characterized by dyslipidemia and hypertension, hyper lipoprotein(a), and a lower IgM anticardiolipin frequency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.