Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000114›Full record

SynthesisActa parasitologica2022

Innocent Until Proven Guilty: Systematic Review of the Effect of Livestock on South American Wild Canid Parasites.

Ariel A Arzabe, Javier A Simonetti

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta parasitologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ariel A ArzabeDepartamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Ñuñoa, CP: 7800003, Santiago, Chile. ariel.arzabe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7601-8405
Javier A SimonettiDepartamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Ñuñoa, CP: 7800003, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7238-4133
Universidad de Magallanes · CLUniversity of Chile · CL

Funding

organization of american states Beca Académica OEA 2018-2020 Boliviauniversidad de chile Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Silvoagrecuarias y Veterinarias 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLivestock is regarded as a source of parasites to wildlife populations, but no assessment of the nature and magnitude of parasite transmission from livestock to South American canids is available.

methodsHere we systematically reviewed articles that evaluate protozoa, helminths and arthropods in wild canids living in areas with and without the presence of livestock.

resultsThere is an unbalanced study effort which precludes proper testing of the assumption that livestock increase the incidence and prevalence of parasites in wild canids. Most of the parasites reported are shared with domestic carnivores.

conclusionAvailable information strongly suggests that the role played by livestock and their associated dogs on wild canid parasitism should be re-evaluated.

Indexed as

CanidaeParasitesAnimalsAnimals, WildLivestockSouth AmericaCarnivoresDisease reservoirsFoxesTransmissionWild animals

Identifiers

PMID35000114
OpenAlexW4206435068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.