Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35000059›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2022

Multilevel monte carlo for cortical circuit models.

Zhuo-Cheng Xiao, Kevin K Lin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhuo-Cheng XiaoCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, USA. zx555@nyu.edu.
Kevin K LinSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3694-544X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) methods aim to speed up computation of statistics from dynamical simulations. MLMC is easy to implement and is sometimes very effective, but its efficacy may depend on the underlying dynamics. We apply MLMC to networks of spiking neurons and assess its effectiveness on prototypical models of cortical circuitry under different conditions. We find that MLMC can be very efficient for computing reliable features, i.e., features of network dynamics that are reproducible upon repeated presentation of the same external forcing. In contrast, MLMC is less effective for complex, internally generated activity. Qualitative explanations are given using concepts from random dynamical systems theory.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsMonte Carlo MethodDynamic simulationsMonte CarloRandom dynamical systemsSpike-time reliabilitySpiking networks

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.