Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34999774›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2023

Intersectoral collaboration in a Dutch community health promotion programme: building a coalition and networks.

Marja de Jong, Yvon Tijhuis, Maria Koelen, Annemarie Wagemakers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marja de JongGGD IJsselland, Zeven Alleetjes 1, 8011 CV Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-2919
Yvon TijhuisGGD IJsselland, Zeven Alleetjes 1, 8011 CV Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Maria KoelenHealth and Society, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Annemarie WagemakersHealth and Society, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-6888

Funding

FNO-Zorg voor kansen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In health promotion programmes (HPP), it is crucial to have intersectoral collaboration within coalitions and to build networks between health and other societal sectors. A health broker role is recognized as being helpful in connecting the coalition with the broader network, and participatory action research (PAR) is deemed supportive because it facilitates evaluation, reflection, learning and action. However, there is a lack of insight into how processes that affect collaboration develop over time. Therefore, this study aimed to provide insights into the coalition's processes that facilitate building and maintaining intersectoral collaboration within a HPP coalition and network and how these processes contribute to the coalition's ambitions. As part of PAR, the coalition members used the coordinated action checklist (CAC) and composed network analysis (CNA) in 2018 and 2019. The CAC and CNA results were linked back into the coalition in five group sessions and used for reflection on pro-gress and future planning. Coalition governance, interaction with the context, network building and brokerage, and generating visibility emerged as the most prominent processes. Important insights concerned the health broker's role and positioning, the programme coordinator's leadership and the importance of visibility and trust leading to investment in continuation. The combined research instruments and group sessions supported discussion and reflection, sharing visions and adjusting working strategies, thereby strengthening the coalition's capacity. Thus, PAR was useful for evaluating and simultaneously facilitating the processes that affect collaboration.

Indexed as

Health PromotionIntersectoral CollaborationEthnicityHealth Services ResearchHumansLeadershiphealth brokerintersectoral collaborationnetwork analysisparticipatory action research

Identifiers

PMID34999774
PMCPMC10405043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.