ArticleHealth promotion international2023
Intersectoral collaboration in a Dutch community health promotion programme: building a coalition and networks.
Article in Health promotion international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multisectoral interventions and health system performance: a systematic review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024Pooled it
- Bridging systems for health equity: a scoping review of municipal-public health partnerships.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Collaborative dynamics in multisectoral nutrition governance of Uganda's second nutrition action plan: a qualitative case study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Optimizing intersectoral collaboration and citizen participation in community-level health promotion: a scoping review.Public health reviews · 2026Review
- Applying the SFIC synergistic governance model to analyze determinants of multisectoral collaborative chronic disease management in Beijing's district H.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The practice of public health coordination in Sweden: roles, responsibilities, and realities.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Coproduction Within Intersectoral Collaboration in the Context of a Neighborhood with Low Socioeconomic Scores in The Netherlands.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- A qualitative exploration of the coordinator's role in an intersectoral childhood overweight prevention programme in the Netherlands: 'a lot is expected from one person'.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The development of an integrated neighborhood approach for health promotion and prevention: a qualitative exploration of stakeholders' views.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Unravelling mechanisms underlying the action principles of a community-based health promotion programme: a realist evaluation.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
- Active and healthy ageing in urban environments: laying the groundwork for solution-building through citizen science.Health promotion international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In health promotion programmes (HPP), it is crucial to have intersectoral collaboration within coalitions and to build networks between health and other societal sectors. A health broker role is recognized as being helpful in connecting the coalition with the broader network, and participatory action research (PAR) is deemed supportive because it facilitates evaluation, reflection, learning and action. However, there is a lack of insight into how processes that affect collaboration develop over time. Therefore, this study aimed to provide insights into the coalition's processes that facilitate building and maintaining intersectoral collaboration within a HPP coalition and network and how these processes contribute to the coalition's ambitions. As part of PAR, the coalition members used the coordinated action checklist (CAC) and composed network analysis (CNA) in 2018 and 2019. The CAC and CNA results were linked back into the coalition in five group sessions and used for reflection on pro-gress and future planning. Coalition governance, interaction with the context, network building and brokerage, and generating visibility emerged as the most prominent processes. Important insights concerned the health broker's role and positioning, the programme coordinator's leadership and the importance of visibility and trust leading to investment in continuation. The combined research instruments and group sessions supported discussion and reflection, sharing visions and adjusting working strategies, thereby strengthening the coalition's capacity. Thus, PAR was useful for evaluating and simultaneously facilitating the processes that affect collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.