Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34999490›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2022

Influence of strut-size and cell-size variations on porous Ti6Al4V structures for load-bearing implants.

Sushant Ciliveri, Amit Bandyopadhyay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Additively Manufactured SiOACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Fatigue behavior of additively manufactured Ti3Al2V alloy.Materials science in additive manufacturing · 2023
    Article
  9. Porous metal implants: processing, properties, and challenges.International journal of extreme manufacturing · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sushant CiliveriW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Amit BandyopadhyayW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. Electronic address: amitband@wsu.edu.

Funding

3D Printed Surface Modified Porous Metal Coatings for Load-Bearing ImplantsR01AR067306 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BANDYOPADHYAY, AMIT · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical properties of porous metal coatings in load-bearing implants play a critical role in determining the in vivo lifetime. However, there is a knowledge gap in measuring the shear strength of porous metal coatings at the porous-dense interface. This study evaluated pore morphology dependence and strut-size on compression, shear deformation, and in vitro response of additively manufactured porous Ti6Al4V structures. Selective laser melting (SLM)-based additive manufacturing (AM) technique was used to process two types of structures with honeycomb cell design-one with constant cell-size of ∼470 μm with mean strut-size varying from 92 to 134 μm, and denoted as strut-size variation (SSV); and the other with a constant strut-size of ∼135 μm with mean cell-size varying from 580 to 740 μm, denoted as cell-size variation (CSV). It was observed that under compressive loading, changes in elastic modulus were more sensitive to variations in strut-size over cell-size. Under shear loading at the porous-dense interface, strength enhancement and material hardening were observed in both SSV and CSV samples due to pore-collapsing. Our results show that for hexagonal cell designs, shear behavior is more sensitive to variations in cell-size over strut-size, although elastic modulus is more sensitive to changes in strut-size for porous metallic structures. From in vitro hFOB analysis, it was observed that pore size of 670 μm demonstrated the highest osteoblast cell viability among porous structures with evidence of pore-bridging by cells. P. aeruginosa bacterial culture showed that bacterial cell viability was higher for porous structures than dense Ti, with evidence of pore-bridging by bacterial cells.

Indexed as

AlloysTitaniumMaterials TestingPorosityWeight-BearingAlloysTitaniumtitanium alloy (TiAl6V4)Compressive strengthImplantsPorous coatingPseudomonas aeruginosaShear strengthTi6Al4V

Identifiers

PMID34999490
PMCPMC8792312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.