ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2022
Influence of strut-size and cell-size variations on porous Ti6Al4V structures for load-bearing implants.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellular Responses to Mechanical Cues Across Scales: From Fundamental Insights to Translational Potential.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Comparative mechanical characterisation of 13-93 bioactive glass and hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research progress on osseointegration performance of porous structure-modified titanium alloy implants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Three dimensionalprinted titanium block to reconstruct severe acetabular bone defects in primary hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Additively manufactured Ti-Ta-Cu alloys for the next-generation load-bearing implants.International journal of extreme manufacturing · 2024Article
- Additively Manufactured SiOACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Enhanced osteogenesis and bactericidal performance with additively manufactured MgO and Cu-added CpTi for load-bearing implants.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Fatigue behavior of additively manufactured Ti3Al2V alloy.Materials science in additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- Porous metal implants: processing, properties, and challenges.International journal of extreme manufacturing · 2023Review
- Improving Biocompatibility for Next Generation of Metallic Implants.Progress in materials science · 2023Article
- Understanding the influence of alloying elements on the print quality of powder bed fusion-based metal additive manufacturing: Ta and Cu addition to Ti alloy.Virtual and physical prototyping · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical properties of porous metal coatings in load-bearing implants play a critical role in determining the in vivo lifetime. However, there is a knowledge gap in measuring the shear strength of porous metal coatings at the porous-dense interface. This study evaluated pore morphology dependence and strut-size on compression, shear deformation, and in vitro response of additively manufactured porous Ti6Al4V structures. Selective laser melting (SLM)-based additive manufacturing (AM) technique was used to process two types of structures with honeycomb cell design-one with constant cell-size of ∼470 μm with mean strut-size varying from 92 to 134 μm, and denoted as strut-size variation (SSV); and the other with a constant strut-size of ∼135 μm with mean cell-size varying from 580 to 740 μm, denoted as cell-size variation (CSV). It was observed that under compressive loading, changes in elastic modulus were more sensitive to variations in strut-size over cell-size. Under shear loading at the porous-dense interface, strength enhancement and material hardening were observed in both SSV and CSV samples due to pore-collapsing. Our results show that for hexagonal cell designs, shear behavior is more sensitive to variations in cell-size over strut-size, although elastic modulus is more sensitive to changes in strut-size for porous metallic structures. From in vitro hFOB analysis, it was observed that pore size of 670 μm demonstrated the highest osteoblast cell viability among porous structures with evidence of pore-bridging by cells. P. aeruginosa bacterial culture showed that bacterial cell viability was higher for porous structures than dense Ti, with evidence of pore-bridging by bacterial cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.