Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34998858›Full record

Observational studyClinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry2022

The ratio of cardiac troponin T to troponin I may indicate non-necrotic troponin release among COVID-19 patients.

Ola Hammarsten, Pontus Ljungqvist, Björn Redfors, Mathias Wernbom, Hannes Widing, Bertil Lindahl, Sabin Salahuddin, Ruwayda Sammantar, Sandeep Jha, Annica Ravn-Fischer and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ola HammarstenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: ola.hammarsten@clinchem.gu.se.
Pontus LjungqvistDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Björn RedforsDepartment of emergency medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at Sahlgrenska University hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg Sweden.
Mathias WernbomDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Hannes WidingRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bertil LindahlDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Sabin SalahuddinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ruwayda SammantarDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sandeep JhaDepartment of emergency medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at Sahlgrenska University hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg Sweden.
Annica Ravn-FischerDepartment of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg Sweden.
Magnus BrinkRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Magnus GisslenRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and troponin I(cTnI) are expressed to similar amount in cardiac tissue, cTnI often reach ten-times higher peak levels compared to cTnT in patients with myocardial necrosis such as in acute myocardial infarction (MI). In contrast, similar levels of cTnT and cTnI are observed in other situations such as stable atrial fibrillation and after strenuous exercise.

objectiveExamine cTnT and cTnI levels in relation to COVID-19 disease and MI.

methodsClinical and laboratory data from the local hospital from an observational cohort study of 27 patients admitted with COVID-19 and 15 patients with myocardial infarction (MI) that were analyzed with paired cTnT and cTnI measurement during hospital care.

resultsLevels of cTnI were lower than cTnT in COVID-19 patients (TnI/TnT ratio 0.3, IQR: 0.1-0.6). In contrast, levels of cTnI were 11 times higher compared to cTnT in 15 patients with MI (TnI/TnT ratio 11, IQR: 7-14). The peak cTnI/cTnT ratio among the patients with MI following successful percutaneous intervention were 14 (TnI/TnT ratio 14, IQR: 12-23). The 5 COVID-19 patient samples collected under possible necrotic events had a cTnI/cTnT ratio of 5,5 (IQR: 1,9-8,3).

conclusionsIn patients with COVID-19, cTnT is often elevated to higher levels than cTnI in sharp contrast to patients with MI, indicating that the release of cardiac troponin has a different cause in COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Myocardial InfarctionBiomarkersHumansSARS-CoV-2Troponin ITroponin TBiomarkersTroponin ITroponin TCardiac troponinCardiovascular diseaseEmergency department risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID34998858
PMCPMC8744390
OpenAlexW4205762853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.