Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34998799›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2022

EEG and fMRI coupling and decoupling based on joint independent component analysis (jICA).

Nicholas Heugel, Scott A Beardsley, Einat Liebenthal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas HeugelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Scott A BeardsleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Clinical Translational Science Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Einat LiebenthalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: eliebenthal@mclean.harvard.edu.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USMarquette University · US

Funding

ZONISMIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEIZURES IN PATIENTSM01RR000058 · NCRR · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI DUNN, MICHAEL J · 1985 to 2006
$19.9M
Neurophysiological Basis of Speech PerceptionR01DC006287 · NIDCD · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI LIEBENTHAL, EINAT · 2003 to 2013
$3.4M
Simultaneous fMRI/ERP measures of Speech PerceptionR21DC004880 · NIDCD · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI LIEBENTHAL, EINAT · 2001 to 2002
$150k
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000058NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006287NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC004880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeaningful integration of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) requires knowing whether these measurements reflect the activity of the same neural sources, i.e., estimating the degree of coupling and decoupling between the neuroimaging modalities. NEW

methodThis paper proposes a method to quantify the coupling and decoupling of fMRI and EEG signals based on the mixing matrix produced by joint independent component analysis (jICA). The method is termed fMRI/EEG-jICA.

resultsfMRI and EEG acquired during a syllable detection task with variable syllable presentation rates (0.25-3 Hz) were separated with jICA into two spatiotemporally distinct components, a primary component that increased nonlinearly in amplitude with syllable presentation rate, putatively reflecting an obligatory auditory response, and a secondary component that declined nonlinearly with syllable presentation rate, putatively reflecting an auditory attention orienting response. The two EEG subcomponents were of similar amplitude, but the secondary fMRI subcomponent was ten folds smaller than the primary one. COMPARISON TO EXISTING

methodFMRI multiple regression analysis yielded a map more consistent with the primary than secondary fMRI subcomponent of jICA, as determined by a greater area under the curve (0.5 versus 0.38) in a sensitivity and specificity analysis of spatial overlap.

conclusionfMRI/EEG-jICA revealed spatiotemporally distinct brain networks with greater sensitivity than fMRI multiple regression analysis, demonstrating how this method can be used for leveraging EEG signals to inform the detection and functional characterization of fMRI signals. fMRI/EEG-jICA may be useful for studying neurovascular coupling at a macro-level, e.g., in neurovascular disorders.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeurovascular CouplingBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyAuditory ProcessingEEGEvent-Related Potentials (ERPs)FMRIJoint Independent Component Analysis (jICA)SpeechSpoken Syllables

Identifiers

PMID34998799
PMCPMC8879823
OpenAlexW4205259422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.