Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34998740›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Digital health2022

Point-of-care screening for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction using artificial intelligence during ECG-enabled stethoscope examination in London, UK: a prospective, observational, multicentre study.

Patrik Bachtiger, Camille F Petri, Francesca E Scott, Se Ri Park, Mihir A Kelshiker, Harpreet K Sahemey, Bianca Dumea, Regine Alquero, Pritpal S Padam, Isobel R Hatrick and 11 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04601415 completednot on this map

Diagnosis of Heart Failure in the Post-COVID-19 Clinic, Primary Care and Hospital Setting Using a Digital Stethoscope With Artificial Intelligence (AI) Electrocardiogram (ECG)

TypeobservationalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2021 to 2021Enrolled1,050ConditionsHeart FailureArmsECG from handheld device
NCT05987670 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Triple Cardiovascular Disease Detection With an Artificial Intelligence-enabled Stethoscope

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2023 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsHeart Failure, Heart Valve Diseases, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart MurmursArmsAI-stethoscope
NCT06699056 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

AI-Enabled Direct-from-ECG Ejection Fraction (EF) Severity Using COR ECG Wearable Monitor

TypeobservationalSponsorPeerbridge Health, IncRan2024 to 2027Enrolled2,000ConditionsVentricular Ejection Fraction, LVF, LV Dysfunction, Atrial EnlargementArms15-minutes of sitting during COR ECG Acquistion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrik BachtigerNational Heart and Lung Institute and Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training in AI for Healthcare, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Camille F PetriNational Heart and Lung Institute and Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK; UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training in AI for Healthcare, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Francesca E ScottNational Heart and Lung Institute and Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Se Ri ParkNational Heart and Lung Institute and Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mihir A KelshikerNational Heart and Lung Institute and Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Harpreet K SahemeyImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Bianca DumeaImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Regine AlqueroImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Pritpal S PadamImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Isobel R HatrickImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Alfa AliImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Maria RibeiroImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Wing-See CheungImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Nina BualImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Bushra RanaNational Heart and Lung Institute and Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Matthew Shun-ShinNational Heart and Lung Institute and Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Daniel B KramerNational Heart and Lung Institute and Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK; Richard A and Susan F Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Alex FragoyannisNHS Ealing Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UK.
Daniel KeeneNational Heart and Lung Institute and Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Carla M PlymenImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Nicholas S PetersNational Heart and Lung Institute and Centre for Cardiac Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training in AI for Healthcare, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: n.peters@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GBLung Institute · USNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBOxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients who have heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is 40% or lower, are diagnosed in hospital. This is despite previous presentations to primary care with symptoms. We aimed to test an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm applied to a single-lead ECG, recorded during ECG-enabled stethoscope examination, to validate a potential point-of-care screening tool for LVEF of 40% or lower.

methodsWe conducted an observational, prospective, multicentre study of a convolutional neural network (known as AI-ECG) that was previously validated for the detection of reduced LVEF using 12-lead ECG as input. We used AI-ECG retrained to interpret single-lead ECG input alone. Patients (aged ≥18 years) attending for transthoracic echocardiogram in London (UK) were recruited. All participants had 15 s of supine, single-lead ECG recorded at the four standard anatomical positions for cardiac auscultation, plus one handheld position, using an ECG-enabled stethoscope. Transthoracic echocardiogram-derived percentage LVEF was used as ground truth. The primary outcome was performance of AI-ECG at classifying reduced LVEF (LVEF ≤40%), measured using metrics including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity, with two-sided 95% CIs. The primary outcome was reported for each position individually and with an optimal combination of AI-ECG outputs (interval range 0-1) from two positions using a rule-based approach and several classification models. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04601415.

findingsBetween Feb 6 and May 27, 2021, we recruited 1050 patients (mean age 62 years [SD 17·4], 535 [51%] male, 432 [41%] non-White). 945 (90%) had an ejection fraction of at least 40%, and 105 (10%) had an ejection fraction of 40% or lower. Across all positions, ECGs were most frequently of adequate quality for AI-ECG interpretation at the pulmonary position (979 [93·3%] of 1050). Quality was lowest for the aortic position (846 [80·6%]). AI-ECG performed best at the pulmonary valve position (p=0·02), with an AUROC of 0·85 (95% CI 0·81-0·89), sensitivity of 84·8% (76·2-91·3), and specificity of 69·5% (66·4-72·6). Diagnostic odds ratios did not differ by age, sex, or non-White ethnicity. Taking the optimal combination of two positions (pulmonary and handheld positions), the rule-based approach resulted in an AUROC of 0·85 (0·81-0·89), sensitivity of 82·7% (72·7-90·2), and specificity of 79·9% (77·0-82·6). Using AI-ECG outputs from these two positions, a weighted logistic regression with l2 regularisation resulted in an AUROC of 0·91 (0·88-0·95), sensitivity of 91·9% (78·1-98·3), and specificity of 80·2% (75·5-84·3).

interpretationA deep learning system applied to single-lead ECGs acquired during a routine examination with an ECG-enabled stethoscope can detect LVEF of 40% or lower. These findings highlight the potential for inexpensive, non-invasive, workflow-adapted, point-of-care screening, for earlier diagnosis and prognostically beneficial treatment.

fundingNHS Accelerated Access Collaborative, NHSX, and the National Institute for Health Research.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectrocardiographyPoint-of-Care SystemsStethoscopesAgedFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPhysical ExaminationProspective StudiesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34998740
PMCPMC8789562
OpenAlexW4206756110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.