Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34998653›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Incorporating HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care for Patients Seeking Induced Abortion and Pregnancy Loss Management.

Sarita Sonalkar, William R Short, Arden McAllister, Corinne Kete, Leah Ingeno, Jessica Fishman, Helen C Koenig, Courtney A Schreiber, Anne M Teitelman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarita SonalkarDivision of Family Planning, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: sarita.sonalkar@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
William R ShortDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Arden McAllisterDivision of Family Planning, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Corinne KeteDivision of Family Planning, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Leah IngenoDivision of Family Planning, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jessica FishmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Helen C KoenigDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Courtney A SchreiberDivision of Family Planning, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anne M TeitelmanSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Virus & Reservoirs CoreP30AI045008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVID S METZGER · 1999 to 2026
$78.6M
WOMENS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CAREER DEVELOPMENTK12HD001265 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Elizabeth A Howell · 1998 to 2026
$7.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI045008NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily planning clinical encounters are important opportunities for HIV prevention. Our objectives were to 1) estimate the proportion of patients seeking induced abortion and early pregnancy loss management eligible for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and 2) compare PrEP eligibility and uptake between patients with unintended and intended pregnancy.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey and a nested prospective cohort study of patients seeking an induced abortion or early pregnancy loss management. We assessed pregnancy intendedness, PrEP awareness, HIV risk and risk perception, desire for same-day PrEP start, and PrEP continuation at 30 days. We used the χ

resultsWe enrolled 250 women. Fifty-six percent (139) had an unintended pregnancy and 44% (110) had an intended pregnancy. PrEP eligibility did not differ significantly between the patients with intended and unintended pregnancy (16% vs. 10%; p = .18). More than one-half (54%, 135/250) were unaware of PrEP before their study visit, and 93% (232/250) considered themselves unlikely to acquire HIV. Of 33 women who were PrEP eligible, 11 accepted same-day start and 1 continued PrEP at 30 days.

conclusionsIntendedness of pregnancy was unrelated to PrEP eligibility in women seeking induced abortion and early pregnancy loss management. Most patients seeking these services are unaware of PrEP. Integrating PrEP into family planning care is likely to increase awareness and uptake of PrEP in women.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, SpontaneousAnti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID34998653
PMCPMC9253197
OpenAlexW4205880657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.