Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34997880›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2022

Effect of preoperative keratometry on visual outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia.

Seongjun Lee, Sinwoo Bae, Moonsun Jung

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Myopic regression after photorefractive keratectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seongjun LeeNuri Eye Hospital, 61 Dunsan-ro, Daejeon, Seo-gu, 35233, South Korea.
Sinwoo BaeNuri Eye Hospital, 61 Dunsan-ro, Daejeon, Seo-gu, 35233, South Korea.
Moonsun JungChungbuk National University Hospital, 776, 1 Sunhwan-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28644, South Korea. msjung@chungbuk.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7282-9657
Nune Eye Hospital · KRChungbuk National University Hospital · KR

Funding

chungbuk national university hospital (kr) 2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the relationship between preoperative keratometry (K) and postoperative refraction and compare the visual outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) between preoperative flat and steep corneas.

methodsThis study involved 814 consecutive eyes of 409 patients who underwent SMILE. A month later, a linear regression analysis of the relationship between preoperative K and the residual spherical equivalent (SE) along with eyes divided by a single standard deviation between flat and steep corneas (< 41.85 D, > 44.57 D, respectively) was conducted. Eyes were distinguished based on the degree of myopia.

resultsOne month after surgery, no significant correlation existed between mean preoperative K and residual SE (P = 0.459). Linear regression analysis showed a weak negative correlation between flat corneas (r

conclusionsOne month after SMILE for myopia, the corneas were flatter in the preoperative flat corneas or all the low myopic corneas, and they were more overcorrected. However, preoperative corneal curvature does not influence visual outcomes at 1 year after SMILE.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesCorneal Surgery, LaserMyopiaCorneaCorneal StromaHumansLasers, ExcimerMicrosurgeryRefraction, OcularTreatment OutcomePostoperative refractionPreoperative keratometrySmall incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

Identifiers

PMID34997880
PMCPMC9156449
OpenAlexW4225674636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.