Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34997526›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2022

Distinct Effects of the Hippocampal Transplantation of Neural and Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Transgenic Model of Alzheimer's Disease.

Henrique C Campos, Deidiane Elisa Ribeiro, Debora Hashiguchi, Deborah Y Hukuda, Christiane Gimenes, Simone A A Romariz, Qing Ye, Yong Tang, Henning Ulrich, Beatriz Monteiro Longo

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic role of neural stem cells in neurological diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Modeling of Alzheimer's Disease to Study the Efficacy of Cell Therapy (Review).Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Henrique C CamposLaboratório de Neurofisiologia, Depto. Fisiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Deidiane Elisa RibeiroDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Debora HashiguchiLaboratório de Neurofisiologia, Depto. Fisiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Deborah Y HukudaLaboratório de Neurofisiologia, Depto. Fisiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Christiane GimenesLaboratório de Neurofisiologia, Depto. Fisiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Simone A A RomarizLaboratório de Neurofisiologia, Depto. Fisiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Qing YeDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Yong TangInternational Collaborative Centre On Big Science Plan for Purinergic Signalling, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, China.
Henning UlrichDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Beatriz Monteiro LongoLaboratório de Neurofisiologia, Depto. Fisiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. beatriz.longo@unifesp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-2638-8061
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a severe disabling condition with no cure currently available, which accounts for 60-70% of all dementia cases worldwide. Therefore, the investigation of possible therapeutic strategies for AD is necessary. To this end, animal models corresponding to the main aspects of AD in humans have been widely used. Similar to AD patients, the double transgenic APPswe/PS1dE9 (APP/PS1) mice show cognitive deficits, hyperlocomotion, amyloid-β (Αβ) plaques in the cortex and hippocampus, and exacerbated inflammatory responses. Recent studies have shown that these neuropathological features could be reversed by stem cell transplantation. However, the effects induced by neural (NSC) and mesenchymal (MSC) stem cells has never been compared in an AD animal model. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether transplantation of NSC or MSC into the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice reverses AD-induced pathological alterations, evaluated by the locomotor activity (open field test), short- and long-term memory (object recognition) tests, Αβ plaques (6-E10), microglia distribution (Iba-1), M1 (iNOS) and M2 (ARG-1) microglial phenotype frequencies. NSC and MSC engraftment reduced the number of Αβ plaques and produced an increase in M2 microglia polarization in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice, suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect of stem cell transplantation. NSC also reversed the hyperlocomotor activity and increased the number of microglia in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice. No impairment of short or long-term memory was observed in APP/PS1 mice. Overall, this study highlights the potential beneficial effects of transplanting NSC or MSC for AD treatment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseMesenchymal Stem CellsAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsHippocampusHumansMiceMice, TransgenicPlaque, AmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAlzheimer’s diseaseAmyloid-β plaquesHippocampusNeural and mesenchymal stem cell transplantationTissue cytometry

Identifiers

PMID34997526
OpenAlexW4206544071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.