Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34997507›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Simulation modeling the effects of peels on pesticide removal from potatoes during household food processing.

Zijian Li, Jie Xiong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zijian LiSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, Guangdong, China. lizijian3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-5966
Jie XiongSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, Guangdong, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 58000-31610004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of crop peels on reducing pesticide residue levels in crops during household food processing was evaluated in this study. We proposed a series of pesticide fate models to simulate the removal efficiency of residues in crop peels and medullas (i.e., pulps) via soaking and washing. The simulated results indicated that the variation in the peel thickness had a significant impact on residue removal from the peel compartment. However, the peel compartment had a low impact on the removal efficiency of pesticide residues from the medulla compartment, as demonstrated by the simulated results from the non-peel model (i.e., already peeled crops). In addition, we observed that even though systemic pesticides have a higher potential to penetrate from the peel into the medulla, the increasing residue level caused by the mass transfer from the peel into the medulla is too low to cause human health damage, because the absolute mass of residues in the peel is considerably small. Based on the simulation results, we concluded that washing or soaking crops with or without peels using water is not effective in reducing residue levels in crop medullas. Modifying crops into slices, instead of directly washing or soaking crops, could significantly improve the removal efficiency of pesticide residues inside the medulla. The models proposed in this study can improve our understanding on the fate of pesticides in crops during household food processing.

Indexed as

Pesticide ResiduesPesticidesSolanum tuberosumCrops, AgriculturalFood ContaminationFood HandlingHumansPesticide ResiduesPesticidesCrop peels and medullasFood safetyHuman healthPesticide residuesPrecookingSimulation modeling

Identifiers

PMID34997507
OpenAlexW4205823275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.