Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34997487›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Removal of sulfur dioxide by carbon impregnated with triethylenediamine, using indigenously developed pilot scale setup.

Sidra Shaoor Kiani, Atif Ullah, Amjad Farooq, Masroor Ahmad, Naseem Irfan, Mohsan Nawaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 65% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sidra Shaoor KianiHazardous Air Pollutants Laboratory, Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Islamabad, Pakistan. sidrachm5@gmail.com.
Atif UllahHazardous Air Pollutants Laboratory, Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Amjad FarooqHazardous Air Pollutants Laboratory, Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Masroor AhmadHazardous Air Pollutants Laboratory, Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Naseem IrfanHazardous Air Pollutants Laboratory, Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mohsan NawazDepartment of Chemistry, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences · PKHazara University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to provide protection against extremely toxic gases, activated carbon (AC) adsorption has long been regarded to be a useful technology in terms of gas removal. AC without chemical impregnation has been considerably less effective than impregnated ACs. AC in present use was modified with an organic amine, i.e., triethylenediamine (TEDA) to enhance the physical and chemical properties of AC in order to remove specific poisonous gases. With the rising concern on environmental pollution, there has been an increased curiosity in ACs as the means for eliminating pollutants from environment. Purpose of this study was to assess the TEDA impregnated AC in terms of adsorption capability for simulant gas like SO

Indexed as

Sulfur DioxideWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdsorptionCharcoalKineticsPiperazinesCharcoalPiperazinesSulfur DioxidetriethylenediamineWater Pollutants, ChemicalActivated carbonAdsorption capacityAdsorption isothermsBreakthrough timeImpregnationSO2

Identifiers

PMID34997487
OpenAlexW4226208244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.