ArticleMaternal and child health journal2022
Comparison of Conditional and Marginal Models in Assessing a Child Nutrition Intervention in Armenia.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biases in Electronic Health Records Data for Generating Real-World Evidence: An Overview.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChild malnutrition is a major issue in conflict zones. Evidence-based interventions and their thorough evaluation could help to eliminate malnutrition. We aimed to assess the causal effect of a community-based multidisciplinary nutrition program for children in a chronic conflict zone near the northeastern border of Armenia on two main outcomes: stunting and anemia. We further compared the interpretations and public health relevance of the obtained effect estimates.
methodsIn 2016, the study measured hemoglobin and anthropometric measures and collected data from the children's caregivers. We used propensity score matching analyses, inverse probability weighting, and overlap weighting methods to examine the average treatment effects among treated population (ATT), and among population with overlapping weights (ATO).
resultsThe ATT for stunting among children who participated in the intervention program estimated by propensity score matching analyses (PSM-ATT) was (1.95; 95%CI 1.15-3.28). Nevertheless, children who took part in the program had a lower risk of anemia (0.28; 95%CI 0.19-0.42). The ATT, estimated by inverse probability weighting (IPTW-ATT), was slightly lower for stunting (1.82; 95%CI 1.16-2.86) while similar for anemia (0.33; 95%CI 0.23-0.46) compared to PSM-ATT. Compared to the IPTW-ATT and PSM-ATT the ATO was lower for stunting (1.75; 95%CI 1.14-2.68) and similar for anemia (0.31; 95%CI 0.22-0.43). DISCUSSION: Marginal models could be used in similar quasi-experimental settings to identify the causal effect of interventions in specific populations of interest. Nonetheless, these methods do not eliminate threats to internal validity. Thorough study design and accurate data collection are necessary to improve the efficiency of marginal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.