ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Variations of human cerebral and ocular blood flow during exposure to multi-axial accelerations : A mathematical modeling study.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human hemodynamic responses during exposure to multi-axial acceleration was a relatively new topic in the fields of acceleration physiology. This study aimed to focus on these responses, especially variations of blood perfusion to brain and eyes, through mathematical modeling. A mathematical model was established using lumped parameter methods, containing compartments of four heart chambers, systemic arteries and veins, circulation of typical systemic organs, and some compartments for pulmonary circulation, together with autonomic regulation considered. This model was firstly validated by using experimental data from experiment of posture change and centrifuge tests of +Gz accelerations, and then applied to analyze human hemodynamic responses to typical multi-axial accelerations. Validation results demonstrated the mathematical model could generate reasonable responses of human cardiovascular system during posture change and exposure to +Gz accelerations. Simulation results of hemodynamic responses to multi-axial accelerations depicted Gy induced significant differences of blood flow to the left and right eyes. And some contour maps were generated based on these results, which provided a quick way to estimate blood flow variations in brain and eyes during exposure to different accelerations. Graphical Abstract This study aimed to focus on variations of blood perfusion to brain and eyes during exposure to typical multi-axial accelerations through mathematical modeling. This model was firstly validated by using experimental data from experiment of posture change and centrifuge tests of +Gz accelerations, and then applied to analyze human hemodynamic responses to typical multi-axial accelerations. Simulation results of hemodynamic responses to multi-axial accelerations depicted Gy induced significant differences of blood flow to the left and right eyes. And contour maps that generated based on these results provided a quick way to estimate blood flow variations in brain and eyes during exposure to different accelerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34997405What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.