ArticleFamilial cancer2022
Detecting inversions in routine molecular diagnosis in MMR genes.
Article in Familial cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inversions, i.e. a change in orientation of a segment of DNA, are a recognized cause of human diseases which remain overlooked due to their balanced nature. Inversions can have severe or more subtle impacts on gene expression. We describe two families that exemplify these aspects and underline the need for inversion detection in routine diagnosis. The first family (F1) displayed a sibship with two constitutional mismatch repair deficiency patients and a family history of colon cancer in the paternal branch. The second family (F2) displayed a severe history of Lynch syndrome. These families were analyzed using a whole gene panel (WGP) strategy i.e. including colon cancer genes with their intronic and flanking genomic regions. In F1, a PMS2 inversion encompassing the promoter region to intron 1 and a PMS2 splice variant were found in the maternal and paternal branch, respectively. In F2, we described the first MSH6 inversion, involving the 5' part of MSH6 and the 3' part of the nearby gene ANXA4. Inversion detection mandates genomic sequencing, but makes a valuable contribution to the diagnostic rate. WGP is an attractive strategy as it maximizes the detection power on validated genes and keeps sufficient depth to detect de novo events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.