Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34997393›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Implementation and Qualitative Evaluation of a Primary Care Redesign Model with Expanded Scope of Work for Medical Assistants.

Bethany M Kwan, Mika K Hamer, Austin Bailey, Kathy Cebuhar, Colleen Conry, Peter C Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bethany M KwanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. bethany.kwan@cuanschutz.edu.
Mika K HamerAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.
Austin BaileyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Kathy CebuharDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Colleen ConryDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Peter C SmithDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation of primary care models involving expanded scope of work and redesigned workflows for medical assistants (MAs) as primary care team members can be challenging. Implementation strategies and participatory evaluation informed by implementation science frameworks may inform organizational decisions about model scale-up and sustainment.

objectiveThis paper reports implementation strategies and qualitative evaluation of a primary care redesign (PCR) model implementation that included an expanded scope of work for MAs.

designQualitative evaluation of implementation strategies and clinician and staff experience with implementation of PCR using semi-structured key informant interviews. The evaluation was guided by the RE-AIM framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

participantsSixty-nine clinicians, staff, practice leaders, and administrators from 7 primary care practices (4 general internal medicine, 3 family medicine) implementing PCR.

interventionsThe PCR model included enhanced rooming and documentation support. The health system used multiple strategies to implement PCR, including rapid improvement events, changing clinic space configurations, developing electronic health record templates and performance dashboards, and practice coaching. APPROACH: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the RE-AIM evaluation and planning framework guided development of semi-structured interview guides. A deductive, structural coding approach was used for analysis. KEY

resultsPCR implementation was facilitated by clear communication about the intervention source, mechanisms for feedback about model goals, and physical environments and electronic health record (EHR) systems that supported the added staff and modified clinic workflow. Clinicians and staff benefited from the ability to see the model in action prior to go-live and opportunities for consistent provider-MA pairings.

conclusionsThe PCR model can support achieving the Quadruple Aim when fully implemented with paired MAs and clinicians who are well prepared to follow redesigned workflows and function as a team. Implementation can be effectively supported by a participatory evaluation guided by implementation science frameworks.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelPrimary Health CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesElectronic Health RecordsHumansImplementation ScienceQualitative ResearchElectronic health recordsImplementationMedical assistantsPractice transformationPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID34997393
PMCPMC8971214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.