ArticleClinical oral investigations2022
Mandibular shape prediction model using machine learning techniques.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of multivariate linear regression and random forest model in developing mandibular chin prediction reconstruction equation.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo create a mandibular shape prediction model using machine learning techniques and geometric morphometrics. MATERIALS AND
methodsSix hundred twenty-nine radiographs were used to select the most appropriate craniomaxillary variables in different craniofacial pattern classifications using a support vector machine. To obtain the three-dimensional mandibular shape, a Procrustes fit was used on 55 tomograms, in which 17 three-dimensional landmarks were digitized. A partial least square regression was employed to find the best covariation between craniomaxillary angles and the symmetric components of mandibular shape. The model was applied to a new sample of six tomograms and evaluated by the mean absolute error. Each mandible predicted was assessed using the Hausdorff distance (HDu) and a color scale. The model was also exploratively applied to six new radiographs.
resultsCovariation was 88.66% with a significance of < 0.0001 explained by twelve craniomaxillary variables. Low differences between the original and predicted models were obtained, with a mean absolute error of 0.0143. The mean distance between meshes ranged from 0.0033 to 0.0059 HDu and each color scale demonstrated general similarity between the surfaces.
conclusionsThis approach offered promising results in obtaining a mandibular prediction model that enhances shape properties in an economical way and is applicable to a Latin American population. Clinical proof of this method will require further studies with larger samples. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This method offers a reliable, economic alternative to traditional mandibular prediction methods and is applicable to the Latin American population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34997358What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.