Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34997284›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Improved coronary calcium detection and quantification with low-dose full field-of-view photon-counting CT: a phantom study.

N R van der Werf, P A Rodesch, S Si-Mohamed, R W van Hamersvelt, M J W Greuter, T Leiner, L Boussel, M J Willemink, P Douek

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

N R van der Werf *Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. n.vanderwerf@erasmusmc.nl.
P A Rodesch *Louis Pradel Cardiology Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
S Si-MohamedLouis Pradel Cardiology Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
R W van HamersveltDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M J W GreuterDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
T LeinerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
L BousselLouis Pradel Cardiology Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
M J WilleminkDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
P DouekLouis Pradel Cardiology Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLHôpital Louis Pradel · FRStanford University · USUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the current study was to systematically assess coronary artery calcium (CAC) detection and quantification for spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) in comparison to conventional CT and, in addition, to evaluate the possibility of radiation dose reduction.

methodsRoutine clinical CAC CT protocols were used for data acquisition and reconstruction of two CAC containing cylindrical inserts which were positioned within an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. In addition, data was acquired at 50% lower radiation dose by reducing tube current, and slice thickness was decreased. Calcifications were considered detectable when three adjacent voxels exceeded the CAC scoring threshold of 130 Hounsfield units (HU). Quantification of CAC (as volume and mass score) was assessed by comparison with known physical quantities.

resultsIn comparison with CT, SPCCT detected 33% and 7% more calcifications for the small and large phantoms, respectively. At reduced radiation dose and reduced slice thickness, small phantom CAC detection increased by 108% and 150% for CT and SPCCT, respectively. For the large phantom size, noise levels interfered with CAC detection. Although comparable between CT and SPCCT, routine protocols CAC quantification showed large deviations (up to 134%) from physical CAC volume. At reduced radiation dose and slice thickness, physical volume overestimations decreased to 96% and 72% for CT and SPCCT, respectively. In comparison with volume scores, mass score deviations from physical quantities were smaller.

conclusionCAC detection on SPCCT is superior to CT, and was even preserved at a reduced radiation dose. Furthermore, SPCCT allows for improved physical volume estimation. KEY POINTS: • In comparison with conventional CT, increased coronary artery calcium detection (up to 156%) for spectral photon-counting CT was found, even at 50% radiation dose reduction. • Spectral photon-counting CT can more accurately measure physical volumes than conventional CT, especially at reduced slice thickness and for high-density coronary artery calcium. • For both conventional and spectral photon-counting CT, reduced slice thickness reconstructions result in more accurate physical mass approximation.

Indexed as

CalcinosisCoronary Artery DiseaseCalciumCoronary VesselsHumansPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedCalciumCalciumCoronary vesselsImaging phantomsRadiation dosageX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID34997284
OpenAlexW4206381542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.