ArticleAnnals of hematology2022
Efficacy and safety comparison between R-CHOP and modified NHL-BFM-90 regimens in children and adolescents with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of R-CHOP and modified non-Hodgkin lymphoma Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster-90 (NHL-BFM-90) regimens in children and adolescents with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are lacking. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed 85 DLBCL patients aged ≤18 years from 2000 to 2020; 74 patients received the modified NHL-BFM-90 regimen, and 11 received the R-CHOP regimen. The 5-year OS and event-free survival (EFS) rates between the modified NHL-BFM-90 and R-CHOP regimens were 91.0% vs. 90.9% (P = 0.466) and 89.8% vs. 68.6% (P = 0.055), respectively. In the stratified analysis, the survival outcome of pediatric patients treated with the modified NHL-BFM-90 regimen was not significantly different from that of adolescent patients. The OS and EFS rates of patients with early-stage disease were both 100%. Patients in the advanced-stage group who were treated with the modified NHL-BFM-90 regimen had superior EFS rates (P < 0.05). The frequency of severe adverse events from the two regimens was similar. There were no treatment-related deaths. We concluded that the modified NHL-BFM-90 regimen has better efficacy than R-CHOP in DLBCL patients with advanced-stage disease. However, the R-CHOP regimen might be an option for early-stage DLBCL. Further prospective studies are needed to guide clinical decisions about treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.