Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34997147›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Automating microsatellite screening and primer design from multi-individual libraries using Micro-Primers.

Filipe Alves, Filipa M S Martins, Miguel Areias, Antonio Muñoz-Mérida

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Filipe AlvesFaculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Filipa M S MartinsFaculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Miguel AreiasFaculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Antonio Muñoz-MéridaFaculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. amunoz@cibio.up.pt.

Funding

COMPETE POCI010145FEDER356016824FRESHING PTDC/AAGMAA/2261/2014Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/104703/2014Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/108018/2015GenomePT POCI010145FEDER022184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of intra- and inter-population diversity has become important for defining the genetic status and distribution patterns of a species and a powerful tool for conservation programs, as high levels of inbreeding could lead into whole population extinction in few generations. Microsatellites (SSR) are commonly used in population studies but discovering highly variable regions across species' genomes requires demanding computation and laboratorial optimization. In this work, we combine next generation sequencing (NGS) with automatic computing to develop a genomic-oriented tool for characterizing SSRs at the population level. Herein, we describe a new Python pipeline, named Micro-Primers, designed to identify, and design PCR primers for amplification of SSR loci from a multi-individual microsatellite library. By combining commonly used programs for data cleaning and microsatellite mining, this pipeline easily generates, from a fastq file produced by high-throughput sequencing, standard information about the selected microsatellite loci, including the number of alleles in the population subset, and the melting temperature and respective PCR product of each primer set. Additionally, potential polymorphic loci can be identified based on the allele ranges observed in the population, to easily guide the selection of optimal markers for the species. Experimental results show that Micro-Primers significantly reduces processing time in comparison to manual analysis while keeping the same quality of the results. The elapsed times at each step can be longer depending on the number of sequences to analyze and, if not assisted, the selection of polymorphic loci from multiple individuals can represent a major bottleneck in population studies.

Indexed as

Biological Variation, IndividualBiological Variation, PopulationDNA PrimersGene LibraryGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymerase Chain ReactionSoftwareAutomation, LaboratoryHumansReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsWorkflowDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID34997147
PMCPMC8741888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.