Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34997105›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Clinical significance of controlling nutritional status score (CONUT) in evaluating outcome of postoperative patients with gastric cancer.

Qi Xiao, Xiaoqing Li, Baojun Duan, Xiaofan Li, Sida Liu, Boyu Xu, Shuai Shi, Jin Zhang, Haoyuan Qin, Xianglong Duan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Modified transferrin saturation is associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Qi Xiao *Second Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, Shannxi Province, China.
Xiaoqing Li *Department of Dermatology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, Shannxi Province, China.
Baojun DuanDepartment of Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, Shannxi Province, China.
Xiaofan LiSecond Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, Shannxi Province, China.
Sida LiuSecond Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, Shannxi Province, China.
Boyu XuXi'an Medical University, Xi'an, 710068, Shannxi Province, China.
Shuai ShiYan'an University, Yan'an, 716000, Shannxi Province, China.
Jin ZhangYan'an University, Yan'an, 716000, Shannxi Province, China.
Haoyuan QinXi'an Medical University, Xi'an, 710068, Shannxi Province, China.
Xianglong DuanSecond Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, Shannxi Province, China. duanxl@21cn.com.
Yansong PuSecond Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, Shannxi Province, China. doctor_pu@163.com.
Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital · CNXi'an Medical University · CNShanxi Medical University · CNYan'an University · CNNorthwestern Polytechnical University · CN

Funding

Key R&D Projects in Shaanxi Province 2019ZDLSF02-09-01Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province 2020JQ-947Shaanxi Provincial Innovation capability support Plan Project 2019GHJD-14The Education Department of Shaanxi Province serves the Local Special Plan Project 18JC027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stomach is the main digestive organ in humans. Patients with gastric cancer often develop digestive problems, which result in poor nutrition. Nutritional status is closely related to postoperative complications and quality of life (QoL) in patients with gastric cancer. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is a novel tool to evaluate the nutritional status of patients. However, the relationship of the CONUT score with postoperative complications, QoL, and psychological status in patients with gastric cancer has not been investigated. The present follow-up study was conducted in 106 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy in our hospital between 2014 and 2019. The CONUT score, postoperative complications, psychological status, postoperative QoL scores, and overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric cancer were collected, and the relationship between them was analyzed. A significant correlation was observed between the CONUT score and postoperative complications of gastric cancer (P < 0.001), especially anastomotic leakage (P = 0.037). The multivariate regression analysis exhibited that the CONUT score (P = 0.002) is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. The CONUT score was correlated with the state anxiety questionnaire (S-AI) for evaluating psychological status (P = 0.032). However, further regression analysis exhibited that the CONUT score was not an independent risk factor for psychological status. Additionally, the CONUT score was associated with postoperative QoL. The multivariate regression analysis exhibited that the CONUT score was an independent risk factor for the global QoL (P = 0.048). Moreover, the efficiency of CONUT score, prognostic nutrition index, and serum albumin in evaluating complications, psychological status, and QoL was compared, and CONUT score was found to outperform the other measures (Area Under Curve, AUC = 0.7368). Furthermore, patients with high CONUT scores exhibited shorter OS than patients with low CONUT scores (P = 0.005). Additionally, the postoperative complications (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.92, P = 0.028), pathological stage (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.26-4.06, P = 0.006), and global QoL (HR 15.24, 95% CI 3.22-72.06, P = 0.001) were associated with OS. The CONUT score can be used to assess the nutritional status of patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery and is associated with the incidence of postoperative complications and QoL.

Indexed as

GastrectomyNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentAnastomotic LeakBiomarkersCholesterolFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountMaleMalnutritionMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentALB protein, humanBiomarkersCholesterolSerum Albumin, Human

Identifiers

PMID34997105
PMCPMC8742112
OpenAlexW4206819952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.