ArticleScientific reports2022
Clinical significance of controlling nutritional status score (CONUT) in evaluating outcome of postoperative patients with gastric cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes and other characteristics of the nutritional screening and assessment tools validation processes in hospitalized adults: a systematic review.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Pooled it
- The bidirectional association of malnutrition with depression and anxiety in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic potential of nutritional risk screening and assessment tools in predicting survival of patients with pancreatic neoplasms: a systematic review.Nutrition journal · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic role of systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) in patients with pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis of 9,764 participants.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Pretreatment CONUT Score and Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Receiving First-Line Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Modified transferrin saturation is associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
- The CONUT Score Independently Predicts Mortality in Older Patients with Hip Fracture.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Associations between controlling nutritional status and mortality in osteoporosis: evidence from NHANES, 2005-2018.Calcified tissue international · 2026Observational
- Prognostic Value of Nutritional Risk Scores in Septic ICU Patients: A Survival Analysis Using mNUTRIC, PNI, and CONUT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of nutritional risk screening on outcomes of first-line treatment in metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: a secondary analysis of the AIO-MATEO trial.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of four nutritional scores in predicting hospital stay duration for EICU Patients with acute pancreatitis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Precision nutrition in gastric cancer: current advances and future directions.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Comparative associations of three nutritional indices with hematoma expansion after intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Preoperative CONUT score predicts postoperative complications in stage I-III gastric cancer patients undergoing curative gastric resections.Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Effect of visceral fat area on prognosis of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy and construction of nomogram.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Erythrocyte modified controlling nutritional status as a biomarker for predicting poor prognosis in post-surgery breast cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of four nutritional scores in predicting delirium in ICU patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as Prognostic Indicator in Stage IV Gastric Cancer with Chronic Intestinal Failure.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Relation between nutritional status on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients: emphasizing nutritional screening tools in a prospective cohort investigation.BMC nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The stomach is the main digestive organ in humans. Patients with gastric cancer often develop digestive problems, which result in poor nutrition. Nutritional status is closely related to postoperative complications and quality of life (QoL) in patients with gastric cancer. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is a novel tool to evaluate the nutritional status of patients. However, the relationship of the CONUT score with postoperative complications, QoL, and psychological status in patients with gastric cancer has not been investigated. The present follow-up study was conducted in 106 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy in our hospital between 2014 and 2019. The CONUT score, postoperative complications, psychological status, postoperative QoL scores, and overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric cancer were collected, and the relationship between them was analyzed. A significant correlation was observed between the CONUT score and postoperative complications of gastric cancer (P < 0.001), especially anastomotic leakage (P = 0.037). The multivariate regression analysis exhibited that the CONUT score (P = 0.002) is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. The CONUT score was correlated with the state anxiety questionnaire (S-AI) for evaluating psychological status (P = 0.032). However, further regression analysis exhibited that the CONUT score was not an independent risk factor for psychological status. Additionally, the CONUT score was associated with postoperative QoL. The multivariate regression analysis exhibited that the CONUT score was an independent risk factor for the global QoL (P = 0.048). Moreover, the efficiency of CONUT score, prognostic nutrition index, and serum albumin in evaluating complications, psychological status, and QoL was compared, and CONUT score was found to outperform the other measures (Area Under Curve, AUC = 0.7368). Furthermore, patients with high CONUT scores exhibited shorter OS than patients with low CONUT scores (P = 0.005). Additionally, the postoperative complications (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.92, P = 0.028), pathological stage (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.26-4.06, P = 0.006), and global QoL (HR 15.24, 95% CI 3.22-72.06, P = 0.001) were associated with OS. The CONUT score can be used to assess the nutritional status of patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery and is associated with the incidence of postoperative complications and QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.