Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34997041›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

In silico construction of a multiepitope Zika virus vaccine using immunoinformatics tools.

Ana Clara Barbosa Antonelli, Vinnycius Pereira Almeida, Fernanda Oliveira Feitosa de Castro, Jacyelle Medeiros Silva, Irmtraut Araci Hoffmann Pfrimer, Edecio Cunha-Neto, Andréa Queiroz Maranhão, Marcelo Macedo Brígido, Renato Oliveira Resende, Anamélia Lorenzetti Bocca and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bioprofiling and vaccine development for Zika virus.Science China. Life sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Clara Barbosa Antonelli *Department of Bioscience and Technology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Rua 235 s/n, sala 335, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, GO, 74605-050, Brazil.
Vinnycius Pereira Almeida *Department of Bioscience and Technology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Rua 235 s/n, sala 335, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, GO, 74605-050, Brazil.
Fernanda Oliveira Feitosa de CastroDepartment of Bioscience and Technology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Rua 235 s/n, sala 335, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, GO, 74605-050, Brazil.
Jacyelle Medeiros SilvaDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Irmtraut Araci Hoffmann PfrimerDepartament of Master in Environmental Sciences and Health, School of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Edecio Cunha-NetoHeart Institute (InCor), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Andréa Queiroz MaranhãoDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Marcelo Macedo BrígidoDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Renato Oliveira ResendeDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Anamélia Lorenzetti BoccaDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Simone Gonçalves FonsecaDepartment of Bioscience and Technology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Rua 235 s/n, sala 335, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, GO, 74605-050, Brazil. fonseca.simone@gmail.com.
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq) 134145/2018-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAPDF) 0193.000417/2016Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG) 201710267001260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) is an arbovirus from the Flaviviridae family and Flavivirus genus. Neurological events have been associated with ZIKV-infected individuals, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, an autoimmune acute neuropathy that causes nerve demyelination and can induce paralysis. With the increase of ZIKV infection incidence in 2015, malformation and microcephaly cases in newborns have grown considerably, which suggested congenital transmission. Therefore, the development of an effective vaccine against ZIKV became an urgent need. Live attenuated vaccines present some theoretical risks for administration in pregnant women. Thus, we developed an in silico multiepitope vaccine against ZIKV. All structural and non-structural proteins were investigated using immunoinformatics tools designed for the prediction of CD4 + and CD8 + T cell epitopes. We selected 13 CD8 + and 12 CD4 + T cell epitopes considering parameters such as binding affinity to HLA class I and II molecules, promiscuity based on the number of different HLA alleles that bind to the epitopes, and immunogenicity. ZIKV Envelope protein domain III (EDIII) was added to the vaccine construct, creating a hybrid protein domain-multiepitope vaccine. Three high scoring continuous and two discontinuous B cell epitopes were found in EDIII. Aiming to increase the candidate vaccine antigenicity even further, we tested secondary and tertiary structures and physicochemical parameters of the vaccine conjugated to four different protein adjuvants: flagellin, 50S ribosomal protein L7/L12, heparin-binding hemagglutinin, or RS09 synthetic peptide. The addition of the flagellin adjuvant increased the vaccine's predicted antigenicity. In silico predictions revealed that the protein is a probable antigen, non-allergenic and predicted to be stable. The vaccine's average population coverage is estimated to be 87.86%, which indicates it can be administered worldwide. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) of individuals with previous ZIKV infection were tested for cytokine production in response to the pool of CD4 and CD8 ZIKV peptide selected. CD4 + and CD8 + T cells showed significant production of IFN-γ upon stimulation and IL-2 production was also detected by CD8 + T cells, which indicated the potential of our peptides to be recognized by specific T cells and induce immune response. In conclusion, we developed an in silico universal vaccine predicted to induce broad and high-coverage cellular and humoral immune responses against ZIKV, which can be a good candidate for posterior in vivo validation.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAutoimmunityCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesComputational BiologyCytokinesEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFlagellinHumansImmunity, HumoralImmunogenicity, VaccineLectinsLeukocytes, MononuclearPeptidesPhylogenyAdjuvants, ImmunologicCytokinesEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFlagellinheparin-binding hemagglutininLectinsPeptidesribosomal protein L7-L12Ribosomal ProteinsViral Envelope ProteinsViral ProteinsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34997041
PMCPMC8741764
OpenAlexW4205309725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.