ArticleScientific reports2022
Genome-wide association study identifies tumor anatomical site-specific risk variants for colorectal cancer survival.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Colorectal Cancer Risk Loci: Prognostic Factors for Clinical Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Pooled it
- Association ofGenetics research · 2022Pooled it
- Investigating the repurposing potential of immune checkpoint inhibition for cancer treatment using Mendelian randomisation.Research square · 2026Article
- A Genome-Wide Association Study of Colorectal Cancer Mortality Outcomes Among Individuals of African and Admixture Ancestry.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2026Article
- Article
- Prognostic factors and survival outcomes in colorectal cancer: insights from a Ghanaian cohort.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Investigating the association between anthropometry and colorectal cancer survival: a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Association between methylation quantitative trait loci and colorectal cancer risk, survival and cancer recurrence.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Relationship between inherited genetic variation and survival from colorectal cancer stratified by tumour location.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Integration of pathologic characteristics, genetic risk and lifestyle exposure for colorectal cancer survival assessment.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Synergistic Antitumor Potency of a Self-Assembling Cyclodextrin Nanoplex for the Co-Delivery of 5-Fluorouracil and Interleukin-2 in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Multifactor dimensionality reduction method identifies novel SNP interactions in the WNT protein interaction networks that are associated with recurrence risk in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Distant Metastasis Pattern and Prognostic Prediction Model of Colorectal Cancer Patients Based on Big Data Mining.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of new genetic markers may improve the prediction of colorectal cancer prognosis. Our objective was to examine genome-wide associations of germline genetic variants with disease-specific survival in an analysis of 16,964 cases of colorectal cancer. We analyzed genotype and colorectal cancer-specific survival data from a consortium of 15 studies. Approximately 7.5 million SNPs were examined under the log-additive model using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for clinical factors and principal components. Additionally, we ran secondary analyses stratifying by tumor site and disease stage. We used a genome-wide p-value threshold of 5 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.