Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34996929›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Plant canopy may promote seed dispersal by wind.

Xuanping Qin, Wei Liang, Zhimin Liu, Minghu Liu, Carol C Baskin, Jerry M Baskin, Zhiming Xin, Zhigang Wang, Quanlai Zhou

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Maple samaras recover autorotation following raindrop collisions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xuanping QinInstitute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China.
Wei LiangInstitute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China.
Zhimin LiuInstitute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China. zmliu@iae.ac.cn.
Minghu LiuExperimental Center of Desert Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forest, Dengkou, 015200, China.
Carol C BaskinDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.
Jerry M BaskinDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.
Zhiming XinExperimental Center of Desert Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forest, Dengkou, 015200, China.
Zhigang WangExperimental Center of Desert Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forest, Dengkou, 015200, China.
Quanlai ZhouInstitute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31770504National Natural Science Foundation of China 31971732National Natural Science Foundation of China 42007427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seed dispersal has received much research attention. The plant canopy can intercept diaspores, but the effect of the plant canopy (the aboveground portion of a plant consisting of branches and leaves) on dispersal distance has not been explored empirically. To determine the effect of plant canopy on seed dispersal distance, a comparison of diaspores falling through open air and through plant canopy was made in a wind tunnel using three wind speeds and diaspores with various traits. Compared with diaspores falling through open air, the dispersal distance of diaspores falling through plant canopy was decreased or increased, depending on wind speed and diaspore traits. When falling through a plant canopy, dispersal distance of diaspores with thorns or those without appendages was promoted at low wind speed (2 m s

Indexed as

Seed DispersalWindMotionPlant Components, AerialPlant LeavesSeedsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID34996929
PMCPMC8741802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.