Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34996804›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Breast screening atypia and subsequent development of cancer: protocol for an observational analysis of the Sloane database in England (Sloane atypia cohort study).

David Jenkinson, Karoline Freeman, Karen Clements, Bridget Hilton, Joanne Dulson-Cox, Olive Kearins, Nigel Stallard, Matthew G Wallis, Nisha Sharma, Cliona Kirwan and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05402436 (Breast Screening Atypia and Subsequent Development of Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05402436 completednot on this map

Breast Screening Atypia and Subsequent Development of Cancer: an Observational Analysis of the Sloane Database in England (Sloane Atypia Cohort Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of WarwickRan2021 to 2023Enrolled3,238ConditionsBreast CancerArmsA diagnosis of atypia as part of the English screening programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

David JenkinsonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Karoline FreemanWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9963-2918
Karen ClementsScreening Quality Assurance Services, NHS England and NHS Improvement, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0113-4409
Bridget HiltonScreening Quality Assurance Services, NHS England and NHS Improvement, Birmingham, UK.
Joanne Dulson-CoxScreening Quality Assurance Services, NHS England and NHS Improvement, Birmingham, UK.
Olive KearinsScreening Quality Assurance Services, NHS England and NHS Improvement, Birmingham, UK.
Nigel StallardWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Matthew G WallisCambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7141-281X
Nisha SharmaBreast Screening Unit, Seacroft Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Cliona KirwanDepartment of Surgery, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sarah PinderSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Elena ProvenzanoHistopathology and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Abeer M ShaabanUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Hilary StobartIndependent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK.
Samantha McDonnellWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Alastair M ThompsonDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sian Taylor-PhillipsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK s.taylor-phillips@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-4346
University of Warwick · GBNHS EnglandCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBBaylor College of Medicine · USKing's College London · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBThe Patients Association · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme aims to detect cancer earlier when treatment is more effective but can harm women by over diagnosing and overtreating cancers which would never have become symptomatic. As well as breast cancer, a spectrum of atypical epithelial proliferations (atypia) can also be detected as part of screening. This spectrum of changes, while not cancer, may mean that a woman is more likely to develop breast cancer in the future. Follow-up of atypia is not evidence based. We currently do not know which atypia should be detected to avoid future cancer. This study will explore how atypia develops into breast cancer in terms of number of women, time of cancer development, cancer type and severity, and whether this varies for different types of atypia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Sloane cohort study began in April 2003 with ongoing data collection including atypia diagnosed through screening at screening units in the UK. The database for England has 3645 cases (24 September 2020) of epithelial atypia, with follow-up from 1 to 15 years. The outcomes include subsequent invasive breast cancer and the nature of subsequent cancer. Descriptive statistics will be produced. The observed rates of breast cancer at 1, 3 and 6 years for types of atypia will be reported with CIs, to enable comparison to women in the general population. Time to event methods will be used to describe the time to breast cancer diagnosis for the types of atypia, including flexible parametric modelling if appropriate. Patient representatives from Independent Cancer Patients' Voice are included at every stage of the research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received research ethics approval from the University of Warwick Biomedical and Scientific Research Ethics Committee (BSREC 10/20-21, 8 October 2020), Public Health England office for data release approvals (ODR1718_313) and approval from the English Breast Research Advisory Committee (BSPRAC_031). The findings will be disseminated to breast screening clinicians (via journal publication and conference presentation), to the NHS Breast Screening Programme to update their guidelines on how women with atypia should be followed up, and to the general public.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsState MedicineCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEnglandFemaleHumansObservational Studies as Topicbreast tumourshealth policyprotocols & guidelinespublic health

Identifiers

PMID34996804
PMCPMC8744119
OpenAlexW4206559092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.