ArticleBMJ open2022
Primary care doctor and nurse consultations among people who live in slums: a retrospective, cross-sectional survey in four countries.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- "They tossed me up like a ball": informal settlement residents' experiences in accessing healthcare in Kampala, Uganda.BMC public health · 2025Article
- An assessment of public experiences and expectations with physicians: a cross sectional study from Karachi, Pakistan.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- What influences slum residents' choices of healthcare providers for common illnesses? Findings of a Discrete Choice Experiment in Ibadan, Nigeria.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Community and facility-level barriers to achieving UHC in Kono District, Sierra Leone and Maryland County, Liberia.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- A socio-ecological framework examination of drivers of blood pressure control among patients with comorbidities and on treatment in two Nairobi slums; a qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Perceived quality of care and choice of healthcare provider in informal settlements.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo survey on the availability and use of primary care services in slum populations.
designRetrospective, cross-sectional, household, individual and healthcare provider surveys.
settingSeven slum sites in four countries (Nigeria, Kenya, Pakistan and Bangladesh).
participantsResidents of slums and informal settlements. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary care consultation rates by type of provider and facility.
resultsWe completed 7692 household, 7451 individual adult and 2633 individual child surveys across seven sites. The majority of consultations were to doctors/nurses (in clinics or hospitals) and pharmacies rather than single-handed providers or traditional healers. Consultation rates with a doctor or nurse varied from 0.2 to 1.5 visits per person-year, which was higher than visit rates to any other type of provider in all sites except Bangladesh, where pharmacies predominated. Approximately half the doctor/nurse visits were in hospital outpatient departments and most of the remainder were to clinics. Over 90% of visits across all sites were for acute symptoms rather than chronic disease. Median travel times were between 15 and 45 min and the median cost per visit was between 2% and 10% of a household's monthly total expenditure. Medicines comprised most of the cost. More respondents reported proximity (54%-78%) and service quality (31%-95%) being a reason for choosing a provider than fees (23%-43%). Demand was relatively inelastic with respect to both price of consultation and travel time.
conclusionsPeople in slums tend to live sufficiently close to formal doctor/nurse facilities for their health-seeking behaviour to be influenced by preference for provider type over distance and cost. However, costs, especially for medicines are high in relation to income and use rates remain significantly below those of high-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.