Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34996786›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Back2Action: effectiveness of physiotherapy blended with eHealth consisting of pain education and behavioural activation versus physiotherapy alone-protocol for a pragmatic randomised clinical trial for people with subacute or persistent spinal pain.

Lisette Bijker, Leonore de Wit, Pim Cuijpers, Eva Poolman, Gwendolijne Scholten-Peeters, Michel W Coppieters

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Selection and reporting of usual care comparators when designing primary care trials of complex health interventions: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Telerehabilitation for neck pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisette BijkerDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural- and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4827-6607
Leonore de WitAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural- and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Pim CuijpersAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural- and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5497-2743
Eva PoolmanDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural- and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Gwendolijne Scholten-Peeters *Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural- and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Michel W Coppieters *Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural- and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands m.coppieters@vu.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsychosocial factors predict recovery in patients with spinal pain. Several of these factors are modifiable, such as depression and anxiety. However, primary care physiotherapists who typically manage these patients indicate that they do not feel sufficiently competent and equipped to address these factors optimally. We developed an eHealth intervention with a focus on pain education and behavioural activation to support physiotherapists in managing psychosocial factors in patients with spinal pain. This paper describes the protocol for a pragmatic randomised clinical trial, which evaluates the effectiveness of this eHealth intervention blended with physiotherapy compared with physiotherapy alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants with non-specific low back pain and/or neck pain for at least 6 weeks who also have psychosocial risk factors associated with the development or maintenance of persistent pain will be recruited in a pragmatic multicentre cluster randomised clinical trial. The experimental intervention consists of physiotherapy blended with six online modules of pain education and behavioural activation. The control intervention consists of usual care physiotherapy. The primary outcomes are disability (Oswestry Disability Index for low back pain and Neck Disability Index for neck pain) and perceived effect (Global Perceived Effect). Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at 2, 6 and 12 months after baseline. The results will be analysed using linear mixed models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of VU Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2017.286). Results will be reported in peer-reviewed journals, at national and international conferences, and in diverse media to share the findings with patients, clinicians and the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL 5941; The Netherlands Trial Register.

Indexed as

Low Back PainTelemedicineEducational StatusHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNeck PainPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicdigital healthdisabilitymental healthmusculoskeletal healthrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34996786
PMCPMC8744098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.