Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34996785›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Training and redeployment of healthcare workers to intensive care units (ICUs) during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.

Norha Vera San Juan, Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark, Matthew Camilleri, John Paul Jeans, Alexandra Monkhouse, Georgia Chisnall, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Post-Pandemic Evaluation of Emergency Medicine Workforce Stability.Archives of clinical and medical case reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Introducing the Next Era in Assessment.Perspectives on medical education · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Norha Vera San JuanRapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8677-7341
Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir ClarkRapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, London, UK.
Matthew Camilleri33N Ltd, London, UK.
John Paul Jeans33N Ltd, London, UK.
Alexandra Monkhouse33N Ltd, London, UK.
Georgia ChisnallRapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1524-4564
Cecilia Vindrola-PadrosRapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, London, UK c.vindrola@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7859-1646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe rapid influx of patients with COVID-19 to intensive care at a rate that exceeds pre-existing staff capacity has required the rapid development of innovative redeployment and training strategies, which considered patient care and infection control. The aim of this study was to provide a detailed understanding of redeployment and training during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic by capturing and considering the merit of the strategies enlisted and the experiences and needs of redeployed healthcare workers (HCWs).

designThe review involved a systematic search of key terms related to intensive care AND training AND redeployment AND healthcare workers within nine databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, MedRxiv, Web of Science, The Health Management Consortium database, Social Science Research Network, OpenGrey and TRIP), which took place on 16 July 2021. Analysis consisted of a synthesis of quantitative study outputs and framework-based thematic analysis of qualitative study outputs and grey literature. These results were then combined applying an interpretative synthesis. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and the review protocol was available online.

resultsForty papers were analysed. These took place primarily in the UK (n=15, 37.5%) and USA (n=17, 42.5%). Themes presented in the results are

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic presents unique challenges to develop flexible redeployment strategies and deliver training promptly while following infection control recommendations. This review synthesises original approaches to tackle these challenges, which are relevant to inform the development of targeted and adaptative training and redeployment plans considering the needs of HCWs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelHumansIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19health services administration & managementinfection controlintensive & critical caremedical education & trainingorganisation of health services

Identifiers

PMID34996785
PMCPMC8753114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.