Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022
Atorvastatin versus placebo in patients with covid-19 in intensive care: randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04486508 (Intermediate-dose Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intermediate-dose Versus Standard Prophylactic Anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents With COVID-19: An opeN Label Randomized Controlled Trial---A Randomized Trial of Atorvastatin vs. Placebo In Critically-ill Patients With COVID-19
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Clinical Trials in Critical Care Medicine.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Statins for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Adjunctive therapy with lipid-lowering agents in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Lipids in health and disease · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of statin therapy in hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2023Pooled it
- Atorvastatin and telmisartan do not reduce nasopharyngeal carriage of SARS-CoV-2 in mild or moderate COVID-19 in a phase IIb randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Atorvastatin for reduction of 28-day mortality in severe and critical COVID-19 patients: a randomized controlled trial.Respiratory research · 2024Trial
- Simvastatin in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19.The New England journal of medicine · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Survival of the hospitalized patients with COVID-19 receiving atorvastatin: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of medical virology · 2022Trial
- Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes in US Medicare Beneficiaries After COVID-19 Hospitalization During the Omicron Era.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Article
- The Economics of Drug Development: A Comparison between Orphan and Non-orphan Drugs.Current drug discovery technologies · 2026Article
- A systems microbiology framework for reproducible multi-dataset omics integration with application to long COVID.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
- Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events in Patients With COVID-19: Association With Vaccination Status and Changes over Time.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Household exposure, demographic and health characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort study in Northern France.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Do Statins Affect Viral Infections Encountered by International Travelers?Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Review
- Atorvastatin Effect on COVID-19 Outcomes: A Propensity Score Matched Study on Hospitalized Patients.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Observational
- Review of COVID-19 Therapeutics by Mechanism: From Discovery to Approval.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Review
- A Dual Pharmacological Strategy against COVID-19: The Therapeutic Potential of Metformin and Atorvastatin.Microorganisms · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effect of statin treatment versus placebo on clinical outcomes in patients with covid-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).
designINSPIRATION/INSPIRATION-S was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 2×2 factorial design. Results for the anticoagulation randomization have been reported previously. Results for the double blind randomization to atorvastatin versus placebo are reported here.
setting11 hospitals in Iran.
participantsAdults aged ≥18 years with covid-19 admitted to the ICU.
interventionAtorvastatin 20 mg orally once daily versus placebo, to be continued for 30 days from randomization irrespective of hospital discharge status.
main outcome measuresThe primary efficacy outcome was a composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or all cause mortality within 30 days from randomization. Prespecified safety outcomes included increase in liver enzyme levels more than three times the upper limit of normal and clinically diagnosed myopathy. A clinical events committee blinded to treatment assignment adjudicated the efficacy and safety outcomes.
resultsOf 605 patients randomized between 29 July 2020 and 4 April 2021 for statin randomization in the INSPIRATION-S trial, 343 were co-randomized to intermediate dose versus standard dose prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin based regimens, whereas 262 were randomized after completion of the anticoagulation study. 587 of the 605 participants were included in the primary analysis of INSPIRATION-S, reported here: 290 were assigned to atorvastatin and 297 to placebo (median age 57 years (interquartile range 45-68 years); 256 (44%) women). The primary outcome occurred in 95 (33%) patients assigned to atorvastatin and 108 (36%) assigned to placebo (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 1.21). Death occurred in 90 (31%) patients in the atorvastatin group and 103 (35%) in the placebo group (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 1.22). Rates for venous thromboembolism were 2% (n=6) in the atorvastatin group and 3% (n=9) in the placebo group (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 2.06). Myopathy was not clinically diagnosed in either group. Liver enzyme levels were increased in five (2%) patients assigned to atorvastatin and six (2%) assigned to placebo (odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 2.81).
conclusionsIn adults with covid-19 admitted to the ICU, atorvastatin was not associated with a significant reduction in the composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or all cause mortality compared with placebo. Treatment was, however, found to be safe. As the overall event rates were lower than expected, a clinically important treatment effect cannot be excluded.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04486508.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.