ReviewSexual medicine reviews2022
The Unfinished Business of Defining Premature Ejaculation: The Need for Targeted Research.
Review in Sexual medicine reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of different doses of daily paroxetine in patients with lifelong premature ejaculation: a prospective randomized crossover study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Trial
- Understanding health care practitioners' criteria regarding the decision to treat men with premature ejaculation.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Self-reported variations in ejaculatory latency time in premature ejaculation: insights into contextual and behavioural factors.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Age-related differences in the prevalence of premature ejaculation: taking a second and more detailed look.Sexual medicine · 2024Article
- Are Specific Sexual Activities During Partnered Sex and Masturbation Related to Sexual Problems in Men?International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2024Article
- Self-reported reasons for having difficulty reaching orgasm in men with diverse etiologies.Sexual medicine · 2023Article
- Progressive arousal: a new concept and definition for premature ejaculation.Sexual medicine · 2023Article
- Erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation: a continuum movens supporting couple sexual dysfunction.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2022Review
- Does Bother/Distress Contribute to the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation?Sexual medicine · 2022Article
- The Tenuous Role of Distress in the Diagnosis of Premature Ejaculation: A Narrative Review.Sexual medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFifteen years have passed since the International Society of Sexual Medicine first established the 3-pronged criteria for premature ejaculation (PE): a short ejaculation latency, lack of ejaculatory control, and bother/distress. Although the process of establishing valid criteria for any condition or disorder is an ongoing one, a dearth of targeted research on these criteria has hindered professional societies from updating and revising them.
objectivesTo review and critique existing criteria used in the diagnosis of PE, to identify specific problems with them, and to recommend studies that will address shortcomings.
methodsEach of the PE criteria was evaluated and compared against standard procedures for establishing validated measures. Following each analysis, targeted research to address the gaps has been recommended.
resultsEach PE criterion has shortcomings and each can be improved by using standard validation procedures, as noted by the targeted research outcomes. Professional societies can play an important role by encouraging broad participation in research that generates new and relevant data supporting, validating, or challenging the existing criteria.
conclusionThe concepts underlying the diagnostic criteria for PE have both broad consensus and functional utility. Nevertheless, much of the research investigating PE has uncritically adopted these criteria without concomitantly recognizing their limitations. These limitations prevent determining accurate prevalence rates, interpreting research findings with confidence, and establishing efficacious treatment outcomes. Rowland DL, Althof SE, McMahon CG. The Unfinished Business of Defining Premature Ejaculation: The Need for Targeted Research. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:323-340.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.