Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34996514›Full record

Trial reportTrials2021

Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep in comparison to not reading a book in bed? The People's Trial-an online, pragmatic, randomised trial.

Elaine Finucane, Ann O'Brien, Shaun Treweek, John Newell, Kishor Das, Sarah Chapman, Paul Wicks, Sandra Galvin, Patricia Healy, Linda Biesty and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04185818 (Citizen Science), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04185818 naunknown statusnot on this map

Citizen Science: The People's Trial: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University of Ireland, Galway, IrelandRan2019 to 2020Enrolled500ConditionsSleepArmsReading a book
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Elaine FinucaneSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. elainemay.finucane@nuigalway.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6052-7205
Ann O'BrienSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Shaun TreweekHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Forester Hill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
John NewellSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Kishor DasSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Sarah ChapmanCochrane UK, hosted by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and funded by the National Institute for Health Research, London, UK.
Paul WicksWicks Digital Health, Lichfield, England, UK.
Sandra GalvinSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Patricia HealySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Linda BiestySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Katie GilliesHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Forester Hill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Anna Noel-StorrRadcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Heidi GardnerHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Forester Hill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Mary Frances O'ReillyFormerly - Nursing and Midwifery Planning and Development Unit, West Mid-West, Merlin Park University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
Declan DevaneSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity of Aberdeen · GBMerlin Park University Hospital · IENational Institute for Health Research · GBNHS Digital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Health Research Board KEDS-2018-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe best way of comparing healthcare treatments is through a randomised trial. In a randomised trial, we compare something (a treatment or intervention) to something else, often another treatment. Who gets what is decided at random, meaning everyone has an equal chance of getting any of the treatments. This means any differences found can be put down to the treatment received rather than other things, such as where people live, or health conditions they might have. The People's Trial aimed to help the public better understand randomised trials by inviting them to design and carry out a trial. The question chosen by the public for The People's Trial was: 'Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep, in comparison to not reading a book in bed?' This paper describes that trial, called 'The Reading Trial'.

methodsThe Reading Trial was an online, randomised trial. Members of the public were invited to take part through social media campaigns. People were asked to either read a book in bed before going to sleep (intervention group) or not read a book in bed before going to sleep (control group). We asked everyone to do this for 7 days, after which they measured their sleep quality.

resultsDuring December 2019, a total of 991 people took part in The Reading Trial, half (496 (50%)) in the intervention group and half (495 (50%)) in the control group. Not everyone finished the trial: 127 (25.6%) people in the intervention group and 90 (18.18%) people in the control group. Of those providing data, 156/369 (42%) people in the intervention group felt their sleep improved, compared to 112/405 (28%) of those in the control group, a difference of 14%. When we consider how certain we are of this finding, we estimate that, in The Reading Trial, sleep improved for between 8 and 22% more people in the intervention group compared to the control group.

conclusionsReading a book in bed before going to sleep improved sleep quality, compared to not reading a book in bed.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04185818. Registered on 4 December 2019.

Indexed as

ReadingSleep QualityBooksHumansSleepMethodologyOnlinePublic engagementRandomised trialResearch co-productionSleepWe wrote this report using a plain language format. We did this in response to how people told us they wanted the results of The Reading Trial to be shared (phase vii of The People’s Trial).

Identifiers

PMID34996514
PMCPMC8740874
OpenAlexW4206495287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.