ArticleBMC palliative care2022
Healthcare providers' perception of advance care planning for patients with critical illnesses in acute-care hospitals: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ceiling of Care in Acute Care Settings: A Concept Analysis.Journal of nursing management · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Advance care planning knowledge, attitudes, and experiences among hospital healthcare professionals: A survey.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Feasibility of a Patient Decision Aid for Advance Care Planning Among Adults With a History of Intensive Care Admission: A Pilot Randomized Trial.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Exploring spiritual needs in older adults with chronic illnesses across diverse cultures in China s: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Current status of knowledge, attitudes, and practices among ICU physicians and nurses regarding palliative care in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Medical Professionals' Treatment Decisions for Critical Patients With Ambiguous Treatment Wishes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Families' Experiences of Surrogate Decision-Making and Challenges of Shared Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of ePOS score in predicting DNR labeling after ICU admission: A prospective observational study (ePOS-DNR).Journal of intensive medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of Advance Care Planning Support on Patients Treated in the Intensive Care Unit After High-Risk Surgery.Cureus · 2024Article
- Implementation of advance care planning decision aids for patients undergoing high-risk surgery: a field-testing study.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Temporal trends of medical cost and cost-effectiveness in sepsis patients: a Japanese nationwide medical claims database.Journal of intensive care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn acute-care hospitals, patients treated in an ICU for surgical reasons or sudden deterioration are treated in an outpatient ward, ICU, and other multiple departments. It is unclear how healthcare providers are initiating advance care planning (ACP) for such patients and assisting them with it. The purpose of this study is to clarify healthcare providers' perceptions of the ACP support provided to patients receiving critical care in acute-care hospitals.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using questionnaires. In this study, 400 acute-care hospitals with ICUs in Japan were randomly selected, and 1490 subjects, including intensivists, surgeons, ICU nurses, surgical floor nurses, and surgical outpatient nurses, participated. Survey items examined whether ICU patients received ACP support, the participants' degree of confidence in providing ACP support, the patients' treatment preferences, and the decision-making process, and whether any discussion was conducted on change of values.
resultsResponses were obtained from 598 participants from 157 hospitals, 41.4% of which reportedly supported ACP provision to ICU patients. The subjects with the highest level of ACP understanding were surgeons (45.8%), and differences in understanding were observed across specialties (P < 0.001). Among the respondents, physicians and nurses expressed high levels of confidence in providing ACP support to patients requiring critical care. However, 15.2% of all the subjects mentioned that they would not attempt to resuscitate the patients. In addition, 25.7% of the participants handed over patients' values to other departments or hospitals, whereas 25.3% handed over the decision-making process.
conclusionsAmong the participating hospitals, 40% provided ACP support to patients receiving critical care. The low number is possibly because support providers lack understanding of the content of patients' ACP or about how to support and use ACP. Second, it is sometimes too late to start providing ACP support after ICU admission. Third, healthcare providers differ in their perception of ACP, widely considered an ambiguous concept. Finally, in acute-care hospitals with different healthcare settings, it is necessary to confirm and integrate the changes in feelings and thoughts of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.