Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34996389›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2022

A predictive model for postoperative progressive haemorrhagic injury in traumatic brain injuries.

Tiange Chen, Siming Chen, Yun Wu, Yilei Chen, Lei Wang, Jinfang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tiange Chen *Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People's Republic of China.
Siming Chen *Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People's Republic of China.
Yun WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People's Republic of China.
Yilei ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People's Republic of China.
Lei WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jinfang LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No.87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People's Republic of China. jinfang_liu@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProgressive haemorrhagic injury after surgery in patients with traumatic brain injury often results in poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a practical predictive tool that can reliably estimate the risk of postoperative progressive haemorrhagic injury (PHI) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

methodsData from 645 patients who underwent surgery for TBI between March 2018 and December 2020 were collected. The outcome was postoperative intracranial PHI, which was assessed on postoperative computed tomography. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model, univariate analysis, and Delphi method were applied to select the most relevant prognostic predictors. We combined conventional coagulation test (CCT) data, thromboelastography (TEG) variables, and several predictors to develop a predictive model using binary logistic regression and then presented the results as a nomogram. The predictive performance of the model was assessed with calibration and discrimination. Internal validation was assessed.

resultsThe signature, which consisted of 11 selected features, was significantly associated with intracranial PHI (p < 0.05, for both primary and validation cohorts). Predictors in the prediction nomogram included age, S-pressure, D-pressure, pulse, temperature, reaction time, PLT, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, FIB, and kinetics values. The model showed good discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.8694 (95% CI, 0.8083-0.9304), and good calibration.

conclusionThis model is based on a nomogram incorporating CCT and TEG variables, which can be conveniently derived at hospital admission. It allows determination of this individual risk for postoperative intracranial PHI and will facilitate a timely intervention to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesLogistic ModelsNomogramsPrognosisNomogramProgressive haemorrhagic injuryTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID34996389
PMCPMC8740436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.