Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34995869›Full record

SynthesisNeuroImage. Clinical2022

MRI markers of functional connectivity and tissue microstructure in stroke-related motor rehabilitation: A systematic review.

E Tavazzi, N Bergsland, A Pirastru, M Cazzoli, V Blasi, F Baglio

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neural repair mechanisms after ischemic stroke.Inflammation and regeneration · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E TavazziIRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States.
N BergslandIRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States. Electronic address: nbergsland@dongnocchi.it.
A PirastruIRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
M CazzoliIRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
V BlasiIRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
F BaglioIRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke-related disability is a major problem at individual and socio-economic levels. Neuromotor rehabilitation has a key role for its dual action on affected body segment and brain reorganization. Despite its known efficacy in clinical practice, the extent and type of effect at a brain level, mediated by neuroplasticity, are still under question.

objectiveTo analyze studies applying MRI markers of functional and structural connectivity in patients affected with stroke undergoing motor rehabilitation, and to evaluate the effect of rehabilitation on brain reorganization.

methodsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria were applied to select studies applying quantitative non-conventional MRI techniques on patients undergoing motor rehabilitation, both physical and virtual (virtual reality, mental imagery). Literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and EMBASE from inception to 30th June 2020.

resultsForty-one out of 6983 papers were included in the current review. Selected studies are heterogeneous in terms of patient characteristics as well as type, duration and frequency of rehabilitative approach. Neuromotor rehabilitation promotes neuroplasticity, favoring functional recovery of the ipsilesional hemisphere and activation of anatomically and functionally related brain areas in both hemispheres, to compensate for damaged tissue.

conclusionsThe evidence derived from the analyzed studies supports the positive impact of rehabilitation on brain reorganization, despite the high data heterogeneity. Advanced MRI techniques provide reliable markers of structural and functional connectivity that may potentially aid in helping to implement the most appropriate rehabilitation intervention.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansImagery, PsychotherapyMagnetic Resonance ImagingRecovery of FunctionConnectivityfMRIMRINeuroplasticityRehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID34995869
PMCPMC8741615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.