Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34995518›Full record

ReviewCell2022

Central nervous system regeneration.

Supraja G Varadarajan, John L Hunyara, Natalie R Hamilton, Alex L Kolodkin, Andrew D Huberman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. PD-1 regulates CD4Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Engineering Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Neural Repair.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  15. Temporal Interference Stimulation Enhances Neural Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Ferroptosis: The Demise of Cells Through Phospholipid Peroxidation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Supraja G VaradarajanDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
John L HunyaraThe Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Natalie R HamiltonThe Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Alex L KolodkinThe Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: kolodkin@jhmi.edu.
Andrew D HubermanDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: adh1@stanford.edu.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Training Program in NeuroscienceT32NS091018 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JAMES J KNIERIM, Daniel Hans O'Connor · 2015 to 2026
$4.1M
Molecular and functional regeneration of the accessory optic pathwayR01EY027713 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUBERMAN, ANDREW D, KOLODKIN, ALEX L · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027713NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS091018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons of the mammalian central nervous system fail to regenerate. Substantial progress has been made toward identifying the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie regenerative failure and how altering those pathways can promote cell survival and/or axon regeneration. Here, we summarize those findings while comparing the regenerative process in the central versus the peripheral nervous system. We also highlight studies that advance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying neural degeneration in response to injury, as many of these mechanisms represent primary targets for restoring functional neural circuits.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCentral Nervous SystemHumansNerve RegenerationNeuronsPeripheral Nervous SystemSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID34995518
PMCPMC10896592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.