Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34995319›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

An evaluation of the diagnostic performance characteristics of the Yellow Fever IgM immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic test kit from SD Biosensor in Ghana.

Lawrence Henry Ofosu-Appiah, Dodzi Kofi Amelor, Bright Ayensu, Ernest Akyereko, Nafisah Issah Rabiwu, David Opare, Godfred Owusu-Okyere, Dennis Odai Laryea, Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe, Julius Abraham Addo Mingle

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Biosensors for the detection of flaviviruses: A review.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lawrence Henry Ofosu-AppiahNational Public Health and Reference Laboratory, Ghana Health Service, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-9097-1729
Dodzi Kofi AmelorNational Public Health and Reference Laboratory, Ghana Health Service, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Bright AyensuNational Public Health and Reference Laboratory, Ghana Health Service, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Ernest AkyerekoDisease Surveillance Department, Ghana Health Service, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Nafisah Issah RabiwuNational Public Health and Reference Laboratory, Ghana Health Service, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana.
David OpareNational Public Health and Reference Laboratory, Ghana Health Service, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Godfred Owusu-OkyereNational Public Health and Reference Laboratory, Ghana Health Service, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Dennis Odai LaryeaDisease Control Department, Ghana Health Service, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Franklin Asiedu-BekoeDisease Surveillance Department, Ghana Health Service, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Julius Abraham Addo MingleDepartment of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Ghana Health Service · GHUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yellow fever is endemic in Ghana and outbreaks occur periodically. The prodromal signs due to Yellow Fever Virus (YFV) infection are non-specific, making clinical signs unreliable as the sole criteria for diagnosis. Accurate laboratory confirmation of suspected yellow fever cases is therefore vital in surveillance programs. Reporting of ELISA IgM testing results by laboratories can delay due to late arrival of samples from the collection sites as well as limited availability of ELISA kits. In this study, the diagnostic performance characteristics of a rapid immunochromatographic Standard Q Yellow Fever IgM test kit (SD Biosensor) was evaluated for the rapid diagnosis of Yellow Fever infection in Ghana. A panel of 275 sera, comprising 81 confirmed YFV positives and 194 negatives were re-tested in this study using the Standard Q Yellow Fever IgM test kit. Using the CDC/WHO Yellow Fever IgM capture ELISA as a benchmark, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the Standard Q Yellow Fever test kit were 96.3%, 97.9% and 97.5%, respectively. The false positivity rate was 5.1% and there was no cross-reactivity when the Standard Q Yellow Fever test kit was tested against dengue, malaria and hepatitis B and C positive samples. In addition, inter-reader variability and invalid rate were both zero. The results indicate that the diagnostic performance of the Standard Q Yellow Fever IgM test kit on serum or plasma is comparable to the serum IgM detection by ELISA and can be used as a point of care rapid diagnostic test kit for YFV infection in endemic areas.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticBiosensing TechniquesChromatography, AffinityEquipment DesignHumansImmunoglobulin MLimit of DetectionTime FactorsYellow FeverYellow fever virusImmunoglobulin MReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID34995319
PMCPMC8741057
OpenAlexW4205888402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.