Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34995307›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Communities' perceptions towards cervical cancer and its screening in Wolaita zone, southern Ethiopia: A qualitative study.

Birhanu Wondimeneh Demissie, Gedion Asnake Azeze, Netsanet Abera Asseffa, Eyasu Alem Lake, Befekadu Bekele Besha, Kelemu Abebe Gelaw, Taklu Marama Mokonnon, Natnael Atnafu Gebeyehu, Mohammed Suleiman Obsa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Experiences of caring for women with cervical cancer: A qualitative study among male partners in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Birhanu Wondimeneh DemissieCollege of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Gedion Asnake AzezeCollege of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6347-8648
Netsanet Abera AsseffaSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Eyasu Alem LakeCollege of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Befekadu Bekele BeshaCollege of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Kelemu Abebe GelawCollege of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Taklu Marama MokonnonCollege of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Natnael Atnafu GebeyehuCollege of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Mohammed Suleiman ObsaCollege of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Wolaita Sodo University · ETHawassa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is a malignant neoplasm from cells originating in the cervix uteri. Any woman who is sexually active is at risk of getting HPV. Women in sub-Saharan Africa region have higher chance of developing the disease. There are nearly 26 million Ethiopian women who are over the age of 15 and believed to be at risk of getting HPV. Regrettably, Ethiopian women typically present for cervical cancer care at a late stage in the disease, where treatment is most ineffective.

objectivesTo explore communities' perceptions of cervical cancer and screening among women in Wolaita zone, southern Ethiopia.

methodsA qualitative research using focused group discussions and in-depth interviews was used to explore communities' perceptions of cervical cancer and screening among women in Wolaita zone, southern Ethiopia from March 2018-November 2019. The study participants were men, women and communities who were residents of the study settings and were not health professionals. All focused group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews were transcribed and entered into Microsoft Word and thematic content analysis was done.

resultsA total of fifty-nine participants participated in both FGD (three with men and six with women) and in-depth interviews (IDIs). Most participants have not heard about cervical cancer but know cancer in general. Participants mentioned that the disease usually relates to many births and unprotected sexual intercourse but none mentioned HPV infection. Most of the participants perceive that cervical cancer is incurable and assume that it could be prevented but they think they are not vulnerable to the disease and screening is not necessary.

conclusionThis study indicates that rural communities in the zone had limited knowledge about cervical cancer and even less about risk factors, screening, treatment and prevention. There is a great need for cancer education and prevention in Ethiopia.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultEarly Detection of CancerEthiopiaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsRural PopulationUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34995307
PMCPMC8740975
OpenAlexW4205198560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.